TRUE, BUTScope Swap
Flat on average, not zero for all
His charts show flat averages for 493 companies. Flat on average is not zero for everyone.
“Despite massive investment, AI has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech.”
11 receipts6 support1 refute4 context

Apollo's charts show revenue per worker and margins flat for the S&P 493 and productivity growth near nil. Other data agree nothing shows up yet in the aggregates. But the charts are averages that do not separate AI from anything else, and an Atlanta Fed survey of executives finds positive gains that are slow to reach revenue.
There’s more to this story.
Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.
30 days free, then A$89 a year. Payment card required. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.
Start free trial →- At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
- Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
- You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.
Inferno Tech Pty Ltd t/a BS Killer, ABN 27 647 413 474
Get tomorrow’s check free by email.
Couldn't check your access. That's on us.
The trick has a name
We call it Scope Swap: applies to far less than it sounds like. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →
Receipts
- Supports apollo.com:
the technology has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech.
- Supports apollo.com:
Revenue per worker is rising for the Mag 7 but is flat for the S&P 493, see the first chart below.
- Supports apollo.com:
Profit margins are rising for the Mag 7 but are flat for the S&P 493, see the second chart below.
- Context apollo.com:
Total Factor Productivity (TFP) is the utilization-adjusted series from the San Francisco Fed (Fernald, 2014)
- Context apollo.com:
so far, there is no evidence that revenue growth or margins are improving outside the tech sector.
- Supports accountsrecovery.net:
utilization-adjusted total factor productivity grew just 0.07% over the four quarters ending in the first quarter of 2026.
- Supports accountsrecovery.net:
About 95% of AI-related productivity sentences referred to future gains
- Supports atlantafed.org:
more than 80 percent of firms reporting no impact on either employment or productivity.
- Refutes atlantafed.org:
Labor productivity gains are positive, vary across sectors, and are expected to strengthen in 2026
- Context atlantafed.org:
perceived productivity gains are larger than measured productivity gains, likely reflecting a delay in revenue realizations.
- Context atlantafed.org:
We use novel data from a survey of nearly 750 corporate executives to study the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on productivity
Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.
