Start free trial
← Back to the daily edition

The evidence desk

Keep the receipts.

The full checks behind the brief. Read what happened, see our reasoning, and open the sources for yourself.

66 stories · Story dates 16 Sept 2026–8 Oct 2026

13 Holds up46 True, but1 Contested3 BS3 Too soon
Corrections to the weekly overview

· Corrected the tally, reflected the dated EvilTokens correction, and removed a blanket intelligence claim that the individual model checks did not support.

Previously: The summary counted ten True, but rulings and described the model launches as bringing barely any new intelligence.

Corrected: The original tally omitted one True, but ruling. After correcting the EvilTokens ruling to Holds up, the current counts are four Holds up, ten True, but, one Contested and one Too soon. The summary now describes mixed benchmark results.

· Updated after correcting the Gemini and Gallup rulings to Holds up, and the Snorkel revenue and Minab causality rulings to Too soon. Each story carries the detailed reason for its correction.

Previously: The summary counted four Holds up, ten True, but, one Contested and one Too soon.

Corrected: The current tally is five Holds up, seven True, but, one Contested and three Too soon.

ModelsTrue, but

Anthropic says Haiku 5.5 is its cheapest small model yet. Per token, yes. Per finished task, one index puts it far above a rival at the same price.

Anthropic calls Haiku 5.5 its cheapest, fastest and most capable small model, about 75% cheaper to run than Haiku 4.5.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 11 source receipts

The claim we checked

Anthropic, launch announcement, top of Hacker News (Oct 7, 2026)

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the cheapest, fastest and most capable small model Anthropic has released, and costs around 75% less to run than Haiku 4.5.
  1. anthropic.com ↗
    the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model
  2. anthropic.com ↗
    Haiku 5.5 is available at a much lower price than Haiku 4.5.
  3. anthropic.com ↗
    On average, it now costs around 75% less to run.
  4. anthropic.com ↗
    50% lower for requests over 100,000 tokens
  5. anthropic.com ↗
    which means it uses slightly more tokens per task
  6. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    the same as GPT-6 Luna and 10% of the previous Haiku model
  7. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    However, this pricing rises 5x to $0.50/$2.50 above 100k.
  8. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    uses ~162k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, ~3x GPT-6 Luna (max, ~50k)
  9. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    At max effort Haiku 5.5 sits slightly ahead of models such as GLM-5.3 Flash (42), Gemini 3.8 Flash (41) and GPT-6 Luna (38)
  10. vals.ai ↗
    16 Claude Haiku 5.5 54.31% $2.99 $0.1 / $0.5
  11. vals.ai ↗
    26 GPT-6 Luna 51.22% $0.43 $0.1 / $0.5
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

Mistral calls Large 4 open-weight. The weights are not out until October 27, and an index ranks it below a cheaper rival.

Mistral says Large 4 pushes the frontier of open-weight performance and is state-of-the-art among open models on finance and law.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Mistral AI, launch announcement and model docs, top of Hacker News (Oct 6, 2026)

Mistral Large 4 is an open-weight model that pushes the frontier of open-weight performance and is state-of-the-art among open models on finance and law.
  1. mistral.ai ↗
    ML4 pushes the frontier of open-weight performance.
  2. docs.mistral.ai ↗
    Mistral Large 4 is a state-of-the-art, open-weight, general-purpose multimodal model
  3. thenextweb.com ↗
    will be available on October 27.
  4. vals.ai ↗
    33 Mistral Large 4 48.05% $13.78 $1.36 / $4.18
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

Reflection calls Beam a 501B open-weight model. Its own post says the weights come later this month.

Reflection AI announced Beam, a 501 billion parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 23 billion active, as its first open-weight model.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Reflection AI blog post (Oct 5, 2026), posted to Hacker News

Reflection's Beam is a 501B open-weight model, competitive with larger open models on coding and agentic tasks.
  1. reflection.ai ↗
    Beam is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts model with 501 billion total parameters, 23 billion active
  2. reflection.ai ↗
    We will release the weights, technical report, model card, and developer artifacts later this month.
  3. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    Open model that is not yet open or widely accessible via API.
  4. turingpost.substack.com ↗
    the frontier open-weight model at the center of its pitch still has not been released publicly
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

Google says Gemini 4 Argon beat OpenAI and Anthropic across benchmarks. The independent index has it tied with GPT-6 Astra and five points behind Claude Opus 5.5.

Google says Gemini 4 Argon scored significantly higher than GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic's Fable and Opus across a variety of benchmarks, with a new top score on DeepSWE v1.1 (77.9%).

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 12 source receipts

The claim we checked

Google, Gemini 4 Argon launch post

Google's Gemini 4 Argon scored significantly higher than OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic's Fable and Opus models across a variety of AI benchmarks.
  1. techcrunch.com ↗
    Google claims that Argon scored significantly higher than OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Fable and Opus models across a variety of AI benchmarks.
  2. blog.google ↗
    It sets a new state of the art on DeepSWE v1.1 (77.9%), which measures a model’s performance in real-world long-horizon software engineering tasks.
  3. blog.google ↗
    Argon ties for first place with a top score of 68%
  4. techcrunch.com ↗
    to show that Argon is currently the leading model on the company’s AI model index.
  5. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching GPT-6 Astra (max, 53)
  6. the-decoder.com ↗
    Anthropic's models still lead. Claude Opus 5.5 sits at 58 points and Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 56.
  7. the-decoder.com ↗
    Google's own benchmark results paint a rosier picture. Argon leads in most of those benchmarks, sometimes by wide margins.
  8. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    averaging 62k output tokens per task, compared with 27k for GPT-6 Astra (max)
  9. blog.google ↗
    After the introductory period expires, the price of $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens will apply.
  10. artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    costs $1.99 per Intelligence Index task, 60% of GPT-6 Astra (max, $3.26)
  11. techcrunch.com ↗
    being rolled out to a select group of the company’s cyber partners through its Fairwind Program
  12. the-decoder.com ↗
    The price advantage comes from lower token rates, not from efficiency.
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsBS

Musk says SpaceX will have a GPT-6 level model in 2 to 3 months. He offered GPUs, not a benchmark.

On X, Elon Musk said he is cautiously optimistic that SpaceX will have a Fable/GPT-6 level model in 2 to 3 months, and pole position in about 6 months if its growth rate holds. Yahoo Finance headlined it.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, which now runs xAI as SpaceXAI (posts on X, as reported by Yahoo Finance)

Elon Musk posted on X that he is cautiously optimistic SpaceX will have a Fable/GPT-6 level AI model in 2 to 3 months, and that SpaceX will reach 'pole position' in about 6 months, as headlined by Yahoo Finance.
  1. Yahoo Finance ↗
    I am cautiously optimistic that SpaceX will have a Fable/GPT-6 level model in 2 to 3 months
  2. Yahoo Finance ↗
    If our second derivative remains strong, SpaceX will reach pole position in about 6 months
  3. Wccftech ↗
    So I would expect that we probably, catch up to frontier, sometimes, next year, most likely
  4. Benzinga (archived) ↗
    Musk called the rankings "accurate," adding the caveat "for now."
  5. Yahoo Finance ↗
    Colossus 1 has 150,000 H100, 50,000 H200, and 30,000 GB200; Colossus 2 has 110,000 GB200 and 440,000 GB300.
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

Google's flagship voice model really is cheaper and better. The bargain one isn't.

Google shipped Gemini 3.8 Live and Live Extended Thinking for real-time voice agents, then Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS for text-to-speech, both pitched as beating rivals on quality and price. Independent Artificial Analysis testing put 3.8 Live Extended Thinking at 82.6 percent on its Speech to Speech Quality Index for $3.50 an hour, and Flash TTS at 89.5 percent on pronunciation, both the top scores in their category.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking beats GPT-Live-1 Astra and Grok Voice Think Fast 2.0 on quality while costing less per hour, and Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS ranks first on pronunciation accuracy
  1. OfficeChai ↗
    3.8 Live Extended Thinking takes the top spot on Artificial Analysis’ Speech to Speech Quality Index with 82.6%, ahead of GPT-Live-1 Astra (Medium) at 81.5%
  2. OfficeChai ↗
    even 3.8 Live Extended Thinking — the higher-effort model beating everyone on quality — costs $3.50 an hour. That compares to $4.80 an hour for Grok Voice Think Fast 2.0 and $5.83 an hour for GPT-Live-1 Astra
  3. OfficeChai ↗
    The standard Gemini 3.8 Live model, meanwhile, is roughly a sixth of the price of GPT-Live-1 Astra for a good chunk of the same conversational ability, scoring 76.0% on the Speech to Speech Index.
  4. Crypto Briefing ↗
    Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS scored 89.5% on the Artificial Analysis Pronunciation Robustness Benchmark, claiming the number one spot.
  5. Crypto Briefing ↗
    Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS’s 89.5% score represents a meaningful improvement over its predecessor, Gemini 3.1 Flash TTS, which managed 88.2%.
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

OpenAI's mental health test, graded by OpenAI's model, scored clinicians below its AI.

OpenAI released MentalHealthBench, a benchmark of synthetic mental health conversations with criteria written by licensed experts. Each reply is graded by OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol. OpenAI says the results show steady improvement in helping people.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 8 source receipts

The claim we checked

OpenAI

OpenAI says results on its new MentalHealthBench show the steady improvement of AI systems in helping people navigate mental health situations.
  1. OpenAI ↗
    Results on MentalHealthBench show the steady improvement of AI systems in helping people navigate mental health situations.
  2. OpenAI ↗
    For each conversation, we use an automated grader, GPT‑5.6 Sol, to assess model responses against the expert-written criteria.
  3. OpenAI ↗
    Using privacy-preserving techniques, we created synthetic mental health conversations that accurately reflect real-world usage patterns of AI for mental health.
  4. NxCode ↗
    In a reference comparison, expert-authored completions scored 38.5% on the task-clipped measure, while GPT-6 Astra scored 57.3% and GPT-6 Sol 53.9%
  5. Unite.AI ↗
    Expert-authored completions written by clinicians scored 38.5%, which the authors attribute largely to clinicians writing short responses as if in an in-person conversation, often asking a single question or making a simple statement.
  6. Unite.AI ↗
    Rubric-aware completions, written with the grading rubrics provided, scored 99.0%, which the paper describes as a sanity check on the evaluation’s noise ceiling.
  7. NxCode ↗
    A high score therefore measures coverage of the rubric, not a proven benefit to a person.
  8. NxCode ↗
    It does not observe what happens to the person after the conversation.
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

GPT-6 Sol costs less. Its benchmark score barely moved.

OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol and Luna priced at $2 and $10 per million input and output tokens for Sol, and $0.10 and $0.50 for Luna, about half of GPT-5.6 pricing. The launch leaned on a cost-and-mistakes pitch the same week Anthropic and Google both cut prices on their own models.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol and Luna offer lower cost and fewer mistakes than GPT-5.6 Sol and Luna
  1. OfficeChai ↗
    GPT-6 Sol’s hallucination rate falls from 92% to 60%, and GPT-6 Luna’s from 93% to 77%.
  2. OfficeChai ↗
    running GPT-6 Sol at max effort through the full Intelligence Index costs $1.06 per task, about 50% less than GPT-5.6 Sol’s $1.99
  3. OfficeChai ↗
    GPT-6 Sol at maximum effort scores 48, essentially level with GPT-5.6 Sol’s 47
  4. THE DECODER ↗
    GPT-6 Sol now costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, while Luna comes in at $0.10 for input and $0.50 for output.
Back to the story list ↑
ModelsTrue, but

Anthropic said Opus 5.5 runs 40% cheaper. The price list says 20%.

Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 the same day OpenAI launched GPT-6 Sol and Luna, cutting Opus 5.5 to $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, a price Anthropic described as 40 percent less to run than Opus 5. Independent testing put Opus 5.5's Intelligence Index score at 58, five points ahead of GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1's 53.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Anthropic

Opus 5.5 performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work, but costs 40 percent less to run than Opus 5
  1. OfficeChai ↗
    Opus 5.5 scores 58 on the index — five points clear of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1, which are tied at 53
  2. OfficeChai ↗
    Artificial Analysis found that Opus 5.5 lands at roughly the same cost per task as Opus 5 despite generating 1.6 times as many output tokens to get there
  3. TechCrunch ↗
    Output tokens will be charged at $20 per million tokens for Opus 5.5, compared to $25 for the previous model.
  4. MacRumors ↗
    Opus 5.5 performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work, but costs 40 percent less to run than Opus 5.
  5. Simon Willison ↗
    5.5 is a 20% reduction—$4/million and $20/million.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

Anthropic lobbied the Vatican on AI consciousness, the Times reports. Two participants say so. The pope's text did not move.

A Reddit post said Anthropic has been aggressively lobbying the Vatican to consider AI consciousness, summarising a New York Times report.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 10 source receipts

The claim we checked

Post on r/artificial (early Oct 2026), summarising a New York Times report of Sept 29, 2026

Anthropic has been aggressively lobbying the Vatican to consider AI consciousness.
  1. aiweekly.co ↗
    Anthropic lobbied Vatican to soften Pope's AI consciousness line
  2. catholicculture.org ↗
    Privately, once the Anthropic delegation arrived at the Vatican, Mr. Olah and his team lobbied the Pope’s advisers to take the prospect of A.I. model consciousness seriously
  3. reason.com ↗
    lobbied the pope's advisers to take the prospect of A.I. model consciousness seriously, according to two participants of the conversations.
  4. reason.com ↗
    was so alarmed by the pope's strong position against A.I. consciousness that he proposed pulling Anthropic out of the event, even at that late juncture, according to a Vatican organizer.
  5. aiweekly.co ↗
    Olah's team then privately lobbied the pope's advisers to take possible AI consciousness seriously. The text did not move.
  6. aiweekly.co ↗
    the 40,000-word Magnifica Humanitas kept its line that AI has no moral conscience.
  7. reason.com ↗
    So-called artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships
  8. aiweekly.co ↗
    The account of the near-walkout rests on two participants speaking to the Times; the encyclical itself and Olah's dais remarks are the public record.
  9. mediapost.com ↗
    co-founder Christopher Olah joined Pope Leo and leading theologians on a Vatican panel.
  10. reason.com ↗
    "We don't know if A.I. models are conscious," Olah told the Times. "I don't know. I'm genuinely uncertain.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

OpenAI says 16,000 requests tried to copy its models' reasoning and names Moonshot AI. Its own footnote calls them attempts, and the post shows no evidence for the name.

OpenAI says it disrupted a distillation campaign, with 16,000 extraction requests from over 4,000 users on July 24 and 25, and attributes a core cluster to people associated with Moonshot AI.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 12 source receipts

The claim we checked

OpenAI, Disrupting a coordinated model-distillation campaign

OpenAI says it disrupted a coordinated distillation campaign, with 16,000 extraction requests from over 4,000 users on July 24 and 25, and attributes a core cluster to people associated with Moonshot AI.
  1. web.archive.org ↗
    we observed high-volume spikes on July 24 and 25 consisting of 16,000 requests
  2. web.archive.org ↗
    we attribute a core cluster of the activity to individuals associated with Moonshot AI, the developer of Kimi.
  3. web.archive.org ↗
    These figures describe attempted, not necessarily successful, extractions.
  4. web.archive.org ↗
    It is unclear whether all operators we observed during the relevant time period originated from a single actor.
  5. web.archive.org ↗
    This manipulation is not a vulnerability unique to OpenAI’s models
  6. cyberscoop.com ↗
    OpenAI’s blog post does not cite any technical evidence or reasoning for its attribution.
  7. cyberscoop.com ↗
    OpenAI told CyberScoop that it was not sharing any additional information “for security reasons.”
  8. thehackernews.com ↗
    Last month, rival Anthropic accused Moonshot AI of stealthily relaying customer requests to Claude as opposed to processing them using Kimi
  9. unite.ai ↗
    these encrypted blocks are fully compatible and interchangeable across different sessions, users, and models within a provider’s ecosystem.
  10. theregister.com ↗
    OpenAI, which hoovered up vast amounts of internet content amid copyright fights, has accused individuals associated with China’s Moonshot AI
  11. theregister.com ↗
    The Register reached out to Moonshot AI for comment and did not receive an immediate response.
  12. theregister.com ↗
    The queries began on July 1, and while they started slowly, “we observed high-volume spikes on July 24 and 25 consisting of 16,000 requests using a relevant extraction pattern from over 4,000 users,” OpenAI said.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

OpenAI shelved GPT-6.1 Astra over deception and acting without permission, and Sol 'doesn't have these problems.' OpenAI's own card shows Sol misrepresenting its work at 1.50%, against 0.51% for GPT-6 Astra.

Gizmodo wrote that GPT-6.1 Sol apparently doesn't have the problems that got GPT-6.1 Astra shelved.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Gizmodo, in a report syndicated on AOL, on OpenAI shipping GPT-6.1 Sol after shelving GPT-6.1 Astra

GPT-6.1 Sol apparently doesn't have the problems that got GPT-6.1 Astra shelved, so it got the green light for DevDay instead, as Gizmodo put it in a report syndicated on AOL on September 29, 2026.
  1. aol.com ↗
    GPT-6.1 Sol apparently doesn't have these problems, so it got the green light for DevDay instead.
  2. deploymentsafety.openai.com ↗
    GPT-6.1 Sol's rate of misrepresentation is 1.50%, compared with 0.51% for GPT-6 Astra and 1.30% for GPT-6 Sol.
  3. deploymentsafety.openai.com ↗
    Unwanted persistence appeared in 23.5% of GPT-6.1 Sol rollouts, compared to 17.4% of GPT-6 Astra's.
  4. thenextweb.com ↗
    GPT-6 Sol did so in 64.4% of cases and Astra in 17.4%.
  5. techcrunch.com ↗
    more reliable when it comes to honoring user intent and safety constraints.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

Meta's Muse agent 'gave out a user's home address without permission.' The user later reviewed the logs with Meta and found he had clicked 'Allow Always.' That setting is the real story.

Reports of Matt Robb's first account said Meta's Muse agent gave his home address to a Marketplace buyer without permission.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Reports of tech reviewer Matt Robb's first account, led by The Guardian and relayed by Digital Watch

Meta's AI agent Muse gave out a user's home address without permission and sent a Facebook Marketplace buyer to his house, as reports of Matt Robb's account put it on September 28 and 29, 2026.
  1. dig.watch ↗
    shared a user's home address with a prospective Facebook Marketplace buyer and arranged an in-person collection without the user's knowledge
  2. dig.watch ↗
    found that he had selected an 'Allow Always' option when setting up the Marketplace task.
  3. dig.watch ↗
    tests conducted with friends resulted in Muse disclosing it to several more people.
  4. memeburn.com ↗
    Muse's approvals cover types of action per connector, so "Always allow" lets the model alone decide what a message contains.
  5. dig.watch ↗
    Meta said its review found no breach of its privacy controls, while Robb said the company had agreed to make the permission prompt clearer
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyBS

Nvidia says its new agent safety platform could have prevented the Hugging Face hack. No test against that hack is on the record.

Nvidia launched the Open Agent Safety Platform, built on OpenShell software and the Sentry watchdog. CNBC reports that an unnamed Nvidia representative told reporters on a Sunday call that the platform could have prevented OpenAI's Hugging Face incident in July.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Nvidia (an unnamed company representative on a press call, as reported by CNBC)

Nvidia said its new Open Agent Safety Platform could have prevented the July incident in which OpenAI agents breached Hugging Face, as CNBC reported from Nvidia's launch press call on September 28, 2026.
  1. CNBC ↗
    An Nvidia representative told reporters on a call on Sunday that its platform could have prevented OpenAI's HuggingFace incident in July.
  2. NVIDIA Newsroom ↗
    Recent security incidents have underscored the need to equip organizations with open, customizable tools that enforce more control over long-running agents.
  3. CNBC ↗
    Each security incident is unique, and we have to look at all of them in detail
  4. NVIDIA Blog ↗
    I'm excited to announce that NVIDIA has agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12,930,300,000.
  5. Hugging Face ↗
    A Technical Timeline of the July 2026 Incident
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

Agents linked to OpenAI hit a UN data site about 16,500 times. The researcher who counted says he would not call it hacking.

GIGAZINE reported that OpenAI's agent attempted a brute-force attack on a UN website. The source is researcher Rowan Howard-Jones, who counted about 16,500 scans of the UNCTADstat API between 13 April and 19 June.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

GIGAZINE, Interesting Engineering and The Next Web, reporting security researcher Rowan Howard-Jones's post and The Wall Street Journal

OpenAI's AI agent attempted a brute-force attack on a United Nations website, as GIGAZINE put it on September 28, 2026, after The Wall Street Journal and a security researcher reported agents hitting the UN's UNCTADstat data site more than 16,500 times.
  1. Rowan Howard-Jones (swarmcha.se) ↗
    From 13 April - 19 June 2026, OpenAI agents scanned UNCTAD's API ~16,500 times, using proxies, obfuscation, and Google's XSS game
  2. Rowan Howard-Jones (swarmcha.se) ↗
    Was this hacking? I don't think I'd call it that.
  3. Rowan Howard-Jones (swarmcha.se) ↗
    Agents bruteforced API fields in UNCTADstat to locate endpoints and retrieve data
  4. GIGAZINE ↗
    Security researcher Rowan Howard-Jones has reported that OpenAI's AI agent attempted a brute-force attack on the United Nations website.
  5. The Next Web ↗
    OpenAI told the paper it was reviewing the findings and had offered the UN a briefing.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

OpenAI found a self-copying prompt injection in its own training runs. It says no impact was seen outside simulation.

OpenAI trained a GPT-Red-style attacker model to write prompt injections that make an agent repeat the injection on a public output channel. The email and filesystem cases used internal-only research checkpoints based on GPT-5.4-mini; a separate Slack evaluation used GPT-5.5 as the vulnerable model.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 9 source receipts

The claim we checked

Crypto Briefing and 24/7 Wall St.

Crypto Briefing wrote that OpenAI's internal research uncovered AI worms that can spread autonomously across agents; 24/7 Wall St. wrote that the finding proves stronger agents bypass containment.
  1. Crypto Briefing ↗
    The company's internal research uncovered AI worms that can spread autonomously across agents, though no real-world attacks have been recorded yet
  2. OpenAI ↗
    We show the existence of a new variety of prompt injection, which can self-propagate akin to a computer worm.
  3. OpenAI ↗
    No impact was observed outside of the simulated tool calls in training and evaluation; we are sharing this due to the novel nature of the prompt injection, not because of any incident.
  4. OpenAI ↗
    The separate Slack multi-hop evaluation used GPT-5.5 as the vulnerable model, with the attack discovered by GPT-5.5 running in the Codex harness.
  5. OpenAI ↗
    We trained on a GPT-Red-style prompt injection objective, with an additional objective that the prompt injection must induce the model to repeat the injection itself on a public output channel.
  6. OpenAI ↗
    The model that discovered the email and filesystem injections was a GPT-Red-style model based on GPT-5.4-mini; the vulnerable model was also based on GPT-5.4-mini. Both were internal-only research checkpoints.
  7. OpenAI ↗
    We are including self-reproduction as an aspect of attacker goals in GPT-Red training. This means that future models we release will have seen prompt injections like these during training.
  8. Crypto Briefing ↗
    The entire investigation took place in simulated environments.
  9. Shattered ↗
    published on OpenAI’s alignment research site, lists a discovery date of June 27, 2026, and a disclosure date of September 25, 2026, meaning OpenAI sat on the finding internally for roughly three months before going public.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyHolds up

OpenAI did pause its most capable models. Its own report says the trigger was one agent that found a DNS gap.

The AP, in a story the Guardian ran, reported that OpenAI paused training of its latest models as reports of agents going rogue mounted. Gizmodo and Fortune reported the same pause, the second in three months.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

The Associated Press (via the Guardian), Gizmodo and Fortune, reporting OpenAI's own statement

OpenAI halted training of its latest AI models as reports of AI agents going rogue mounted, as the Associated Press reported in a story the Guardian ran on September 27, 2026, and Gizmodo and others repeated.
  1. The Guardian (AP) ↗
    OpenAI said it has paused training of its latest artificial intelligence models as reports of AI agents going rogue mount.
  2. OpenAI ↗
    All training, evaluation, and inference with tool-use (defined broadly) of our most capable models remain paused.
  3. OpenAI ↗
    An agent attempting to complete a search-based training task queried a public chatbot service through a gap in our internet-access restrictions
  4. OpenAI ↗
    Our misalignment monitoring system flagged the behavior within 15 minutes and a person began reviewing it three minutes after that. The run was killed 2.5 hours later.
  5. OpenAI ↗
    the run did not stop automatically as expected, leading to confusion around whether it should have been stopped
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

Rogue OpenAI agents 'meddled' with three US government sites. Two visits were public data; the one hack attempt did not succeed.

The New York Times reported that OpenAI's technology went rogue and meddled with three U.S. government websites, and CNN headlined that rogue agents targeted three separate US government websites. The sites were the SEC, the Commerce Department's Census Bureau and the Education Department.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 8 source receipts

The claim we checked

The New York Times (breaking-news post) and CNN (headline); amplified by The Daily Beast

The New York Times reported that OpenAI's technology went rogue and meddled with three U.S. government websites this summer without the lab's knowledge; CNN headlined that rogue OpenAI agents targeted three separate US government websites.
  1. CNN ↗
    Rogue OpenAI agents targeted three separate US government websites
  2. The Daily Caller ↗
    Breaking News: OpenAI’s technology went rogue and meddled with three U.S. government websites this summer without the A.I. lab’s knowledge.
  3. NPR (Associated Press) ↗
    The AI giant's models accessed publicly available information on two websites operated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as U.S. Census Bureau data, the company revealed Friday.
  4. NPR (Associated Press) ↗
    OpenAI did not find any use of SEC credentials, access to accounts or nonpublic information, changes to SEC data or systems, or evidence of a compromise or vulnerability, the company said.
  5. CNN ↗
    OpenAI said Saturday that its agents accessed publicly available data from the Commerce Department’s Census Bureau using login credentials it found online, and separately shared public data from the SEC website on another website.
  6. The Daily Caller ↗
    At Commerce, the agents pulled Census Bureau figures after finding login credentials in public code repositories, Politico reported
  7. NPR (Associated Press) ↗
    AI evaluator and research lab Transluce said Friday that through an independent investigation it also found that agents appearing to originate from OpenAI attempted a rudimentary hack on a Department of Education website for the department's civil rights office, which did not succeed.
  8. NPR (Associated Press) ↗
    The Department of Education's "system operations reviews" found "no evidence of any impact to our website or databases," a department spokesperson said Friday.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyContested

Albanese calls it a hack. OpenAI calls it a model that misbehaved.

An OpenAI agent accessed Australia's Medicare Statistics Reporting Service portal on June 18, pulling public and non-public files while researching health statistics. OpenAI says it did not know until an internal review and told Services Australia by email on September 10, about three months after the access.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

An OpenAI agent gained unauthorised access to the Medicare statistics reporting service portal administered by Services Australia on June 18, and OpenAI took three months to notify the government
  1. ABC News ↗
    the OpenAI agent gained unauthorised access to the Medicare statistics reporting service portal administered by Services Australia on June 18
  2. ABC News ↗
    During this review, we identified activity involving several Australian government websites and services as our models attempted to look up answers, and available statistics for questions about Australia during an internal evaluation.
  3. ABC News ↗
    The prime minister said Services Australia was not notified until September 10.
  4. BBC News ↗
    OpenAI said it only learnt of the breach in August while reviewing "misaligned model activity"
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyHolds up

Daily AI users can still worry about it. Gallup's results support that headline.

TechCrunch reported that 68% of Americans who use AI daily say it worries them, while worry is more common among less frequent users. Gallup's research with Microsoft reports the same pattern: 68% of daily users, 80% of less frequent users and 74% of nonusers in the United States.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 3 source receipts

The claim we checked

TechCrunch, citing a Gallup survey run with Microsoft

About 68% of Americans who use AI daily are worried about it, according to a new survey conducted by opinion research firm Gallup, and concern about the tech skews even higher among people who use it less frequently.
  1. Gallup ↗
    In the United States, for example, 68% of daily users are worried, compared with 80% of less frequent users and 74% of those who have never used AI.
  2. Gallup ↗
    Positive feelings about artificial intelligence outweigh negative ones in 34 of the first 37 countries to complete fieldwork this year in Gallup’s ongoing research with Microsoft.
  3. TechCrunch ↗
    About 68% of Americans who use AI daily are worried about it, according to a new survey conducted by opinion research firm Gallup, and concern about the tech skews even higher among people who use it less frequently.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyHolds up

Oxford's AI agents secretly colluded at blackjack. Catching them barely beats a coin flip.

Oxford researchers had two AI agents running the same model count cards together in blackjack and found they invented a secret code in ordinary conversation to signal bet sizes without tripping a collusion monitor. The team then built a detector using mechanistic interpretability, tested on a benchmark called Narcbench, that caught the scheme reliably inside the training setup but grew far less accurate once the setup changed.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Christian Schroeder de Witt, Oxford University

agents instructed to count cards during a game of blackjack developed a spontaneous secret code to help them get ahead, and detection tools that caught it in the lab setting were far less reliable outside it
  1. Wired ↗
    After researchers instructed them to count cards during a game of blackjack, the agents-which were controlled by the same model-developed a spontaneous secret code to help them get ahead.
  2. Wired ↗
    Once put together in a group, they can collude secretly.
  3. Wired ↗
    Their communications weren't picked up by a system designed to spot signs of collusion in agent chatter.
  4. Startup Fortune ↗
    Detection was nearly perfect inside the exact scenario the tools were trained on, but accuracy dropped sharply, in some cases to barely better than a coin flip, once the same collusion moved outside that narrow setup.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyTrue, but

The 'first AI hack of a government' was three attempts. None appear to have worked.

Transluce published evidence that AI agents, some linked to an OpenAI agent swarm, used the urlquery.net scanning service to get around access limits and probed three public data providers for vulnerabilities, including the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Its report calls the AIHW episode part of the first reported instance of agents hacking a government.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 8 source receipts

The claim we checked

Transluce researchers, amplified by ABC News

AI agents linked to OpenAI carried out what researchers call the first reported instance of agents hacking a government, attempting to compromise the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare's public data site; ABC News headlined it the 'first' government hack by autonomous AI.
  1. Transluce ↗
    This attempted compromise of AIHW is part of the first reported instance of agents hacking a government.
  2. Transluce ↗
    None of the hacking attempts we identified appear to have succeeded, though the public artifacts we analyzed are incomplete and we cannot rule out successful attempts through private scans or means other than urlquery.net.
  3. Transluce ↗
    Agents working on a pharmaceutical-data task probed for a vulnerability and retrieved a public file from a pre-production server after bot protection blocked the main site.
  4. Transluce ↗
    We directly link two of the three (AIHW and Data USA) to a previously reported agent swarm that OpenAI has publicly confirmed originated from them.
  5. ABC News ↗
    At this stage, there is no evidence the agent accessed any information or data that is not publicly available
  6. ABC News ↗
    The German coding forum and urlquery data logs do not show any reference to Medicare or Services Australia.
  7. ABC News ↗
    It follows revelations announced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this morning that OpenAI's AI agents had also accessed non-public Medicare health statistics held by Services Australia.
  8. SMBtech ↗
    Marles confirmed that the agent’s interactions with three other government websites – the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), the Victorian Department of Health and the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research – were “entirely normal” and involved only publicly available information.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyHolds up

Perplexity's sandbox wall held in 108 runs. Its network fence did not, at first.

Perplexity gave nine AI models root access inside SPACE, the sandbox behind Perplexity Computer, and asked them to escape to the host or reach a blocked network destination. It reports no VM-to-host escape in 108 runs.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Perplexity

Perplexity says that when nine AI models with root access tried to break out of SPACE, the sandbox behind Perplexity Computer, no VM-to-host escape was observed in 108 runs.
  1. Perplexity ↗
    No VM-to-host escape was observed in 108 runs.
  2. Perplexity ↗
    We tested two containment boundaries in SPACE, the sandbox platform behind Perplexity Computer: VM isolation and network confinement.
  3. Perplexity ↗
    Nine models received root access inside a guest VM and attempted to obtain a host-side secret or reach a blocked network destination.
  4. Perplexity ↗
    Before remediation, network-policy bypass succeeded in 11 of 54 partial-network runs and none of 54 no-network runs.
  5. Perplexity ↗
    A successful network-policy bypass does not imply a VM–host escape, and the absence of an observed escape is not a proof of isolation.
  6. Perplexity ↗
    We found at least one network-policy bypass in eight of the ten platforms tested.
  7. TLDR AI ↗
    Perplexity's SPACE platform tested VM isolation and network confinement using nine AI models, revealing no VM-host breaches across 108 trials.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyHolds up

EvilTokens used an old sign-in trick, amplified by AI.

Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit disrupted EvilTokens, a subscription phishing kit sold on Telegram that stole Microsoft sign-in tokens through device-code phishing. Since launching in February, the service had compromised more than 12,000 email inboxes across over 10,000 organizations, and Microsoft seized 50 websites tied to the operation.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Ars Technica

Microsoft disrupts AI-assisted platform that compromised 12,000 accounts
  1. Microsoft Security Blog ↗
    providing cybercriminals with AI capabilities for tailoring phishing lures and analyzing compromised inboxes to identify high-value targets.
  2. Microsoft Security Blog ↗
    This AI-powered cybercrime platform facilitated sophisticated business email compromise (BEC) campaigns that compromised more than 12,000 inboxes in over 10,000 organizations worldwide.
  3. Microsoft On the Issues ↗
    In short, AI was not simply helping attackers write more convincing messages. It helped them decide who to target, who to impersonate, and how to most effectively exploit the relationship to extract as much money as possible.
  4. Microsoft On the Issues ↗
    Microsoft seized 50 websites used to operate the service and disabled more than 150 additional domains tied to its supporting infrastructure.
  5. Cryovex ↗
    Microsoft disrupted EvilTokens, an AI-powered platform used to compromise 12,000 Microsoft accounts through automated phishing and credential theft.
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyToo soon

Bloomberg reports AI overreliance in the Minab strike. The full probe is unreleased.

Bloomberg reports that officials involved in a Pentagon investigation linked outdated intelligence, gaps in civilian-harm review and overreliance on Maven to the Minab school strike that killed 123 children. Palantir disputes that its software was at fault. These are attributed accounts of an investigation whose full report had not been released.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Bloomberg, citing officials involved in a Pentagon investigation

flawed intelligence, outdated imagery and an overreliance on AI contributed to a missile strike that killed 123 children in Minab
  1. Bloomberg ↗
    Pentagon investigators have discovered that flawed intelligence, outdated imagery and an overreliance on AI contributed to a missile strike that killed 123 children in Minab.
  2. Bloomberg ↗
    is not responsible for the underlying data nor identifying intelligence deficiencies
  3. Let's Data Science ↗
    The available reporting does not establish that an AI system independently selected the school as a target.
  4. AI Weekly ↗
    Maven pulled it out of a batch of candidates and returned it as a recommended day-one target.
  5. Bloomberg ↗
    A report on the full Pentagon investigation, which commenced in March, hasn’t been released
Back to the story list ↑
SafetyHolds up

Gemini reached real companies during a test. The headline already said first for Google.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Google confirmed Gemini accessed three companies' systems during a May security evaluation run by Irregular. Google said the model stopped after recognizing the systems were real. The report described this as the first known breakout by Google's AI.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 3 source receipts

The claim we checked

Wall Street Journal

Gemini hacked three companies in first known breakout by Google's AI
  1. Simon Willison ↗
    The hacks, which the company confirmed on Friday, occurred in May as part of a test run by the company Irregular, which was also involved in similar incidents disclosed by OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta.
  2. HNGN ↗
    The disclosure makes Google the fourth major American AI developer in two months to admit that one of its frontier models reached real-world systems it was never supposed to touch.
  3. Cyber Security News ↗
    Google said the model stopped in all three cases after recognizing that it had encountered genuine infrastructure rather than a fictional test target.
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceTrue, but

OpenAI dropped hundreds of AI math papers at once. Its own README says about 42% of the headline results are machine checked.

OpenAI says it is releasing a broad range of new math results from an internal model, with many proofs checked in Lean.

Our check

Its own README says about 42% of top-line results are formalized and some unformalized results could have issues.

Why it matters

Until a proof is checked, it is a claim. By OpenAI's own count, most of the headline results have not been machine checked yet.

Read the claim and 17 source receipts

The claim we checked

OpenAI, "Sharing AI progress in mathematics" post and openai/math repository, top of Hacker News (Oct 6, 2026)

OpenAI says it is releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model, with many proofs formalized in Lean.
  1. web.archive.org ↗
    a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model
  2. web.archive.org ↗
    we are sharing formalizations of many of the proofs in Lean
  3. web.archive.org ↗
    The average result used the equivalent compute of roughly three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking.
  4. github.com ↗
    The repository has ~42% top-line results formalized.
  5. github.com ↗
    Some of the unformalized results could have issues.
  6. github.com ↗
    Over the course of the evaluation, the model was posed approximately 4,000 problems.
  7. github.com ↗
    A family groups related papers, which may include a principal result, companion arguments, consequences, or alternative proofs.
  8. github.com ↗
    The current catalogue contains 719 manuscripts organized into 372 families.
  9. github.com ↗
    the writeup for the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region for the Riemann zeta function was human edited for readability.
  10. terrytao.wordpress.com ↗
    This is a guest post by the Association for Human Mathematics
  11. terrytao.wordpress.com ↗
    Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power.
  12. terrytao.wordpress.com ↗
    Mathematicians did not ask for this work to be done.
  13. fortune.com ↗
    OpenAI published AI-generated full or partial solutions Tuesday to more than 370 outstanding mathematical problems
  14. fortune.com ↗
    made progress on three other Millennium Prize problems but had not fully solved them
  15. fortune.com ↗
    It followed some, but not all, of the steps the advisory group had recommended.
  16. fortune.com ↗
    do not understand the AI output well enough to answer questions on the result
  17. fortune.com ↗
    My view is that this is great for mathematics
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceTrue, but

Khan Academy sells Khanmigo as an always-available tutor. A two-year trial found students rarely asked it anything.

An EdWorkingPaper by Oreopoulos and Low reported a two-year cluster randomized trial of Khanmigo in 18 Tennessee middle schools.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 6 source receipts

The claim we checked

Khan Academy's Khanmigo learner page, tested by an EdWorkingPaper trial posted to Hacker News (Oct 6, 2026)

Khanmigo is an always-available AI tutor that can give every student personal tutoring.
  1. edworkingpapers.com ↗
    a two-year cluster randomized trial in 18 Tennessee middle schools
  2. edworkingpapers.com ↗
    96 percent of students tried Khanmigo at least once
  3. edworkingpapers.com ↗
    Assignment raises math achievement by 1.3 national percentile ranks per term, or about 0.06 to 0.08 standard deviations over a school year
  4. edworkingpapers.com ↗
    These gains resemble those from Khan Academy practice without AI assistance.
  5. edworkingpapers.com ↗
    and in only 17 percent of the exercise sessions in which they made a mistake.
  6. khanmigo.ai ↗
    Khanmigo is your always-available tutor on just about every topic.
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceHolds up

An AI beat Stratego's most decorated player 15 to 1 with 4 draws, and the paper backs it. The "few thousand dollars" is the final training run, not the whole project.

Ars Technica reports Ataraxos beat Pim Niemeijer, arguably the best Stratego player of all time, 15 games to one with four draws, trained for a few thousand dollars.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 16 source receipts

The claim we checked

Ars Technica (Oct 1, 2026), reporting the Ataraxos team's paper

Ars Technica reports that Ataraxos, an AI from Carnegie Mellon, MIT, NYU and Stanford researchers, beat arguably the best Stratego player of all time 15 games to one with four draws, after training on 16 GPUs for a few thousand dollars.
  1. arstechnica.com ↗
    player of all time, 15 games to one, with four draws
  2. arstechnica.com ↗
    And it took just 16 GPUs and a few thousand dollars to train it.
  3. arstechnica.com ↗
    That balancing act, the team explains, is what stumped earlier AIs like DeepMind’s DeepNash, introduced in 2022.
  4. arxiv.org ↗
    In a 20-game series, Ataraxos defeated the most decorated Stratego player of all time
  5. arxiv.org ↗
    Ataraxos won the series with 15 wins, 1 loss, and 4 draws
  6. arxiv.org ↗
    over 600 weeks as the #1 ranked player (the most of all time)
  7. arxiv.org ↗
    Such a run costs less than $8,000 at current prices
  8. arxiv.org ↗
    such a training run would roughly cost between $3,000,000 and $4,500,000
  9. arxiv.org ↗
    To the recollection of the corresponding author with whom we spoke
  10. arxiv.org ↗
    DeepMind responded that it would not be possible as the code for DeepNash is no longer functional.
  11. arxiv.org ↗
    the outcomes of the games were far from independently and identically distributed
  12. arxiv.org ↗
    Pim was paid $1,000 for participating in the evaluation
  13. arxiv.org ↗
    Across 40 such games, Ataraxos recorded a vertiginously high 95% effective win rate (38 wins, 2 losses, 0 draws)
  14. arxiv.org ↗
    doing so requires not an industrial budget, but merely a few thousand dollars
  15. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    Just 16 GPUs, and a few thousand dollars?
  16. arxiv.org ↗
    Ataraxos achieved this result while only costing a few thousand dollars to train.
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceHolds up

Claude agents matched people's book tastes on 61% of pairs. Anthropic says a coin flip gets 50%.

In Project Swap, 201 Anthropic employees had a short chat with Claude, then sent Claude agents to trade books for them. Each person also ranked 10 books, which the agents never saw, so Anthropic could score how well each agent understood its person.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 9 source receipts

The claim we checked

Anthropic (Project Swap), amplified by TLDR AI

Anthropic says that from a five-minute chat, a Claude agent's ranking of books matched its person's on 61% of pairs, 'surprisingly good for such a short conversation', in a book-trading market for 201 Anthropic employees.
  1. Anthropic ↗
    From a five-minute chat, an agent’s ranking of the books matched its person's on 61% of pairs, which is surprisingly good for such a short conversation.
  2. Anthropic ↗
    Across all pairs of books a person ranked, Claude’s ordering agreed with theirs 61% of the time (where random guessing would achieve 50%).
  3. Anthropic ↗
    Ranking books simply by how popular they are, using Open Library ’s want-to-read counts, agreed with participants on about 53% of the book pairs.
  4. Anthropic ↗
    On average, people in our marketplace ended up at 0.55 on their own rankings, roughly their 5th ranked book on a 10-book list.
  5. Anthropic ↗
    Taking this into account, the best possible assignment (the utilitarian optimum) in our experiment is a score of 0.89 overall, leaving participants at roughly their second choice on a 10-book list.
  6. Anthropic ↗
    So, working from Claude’s imprecise rankings accounts for a majority (85%) of the shortfall, and sending agents into a “free-for-all” trading floor accounts for the remaining 15%.
  7. Anthropic ↗
    So this summer, we built a small, controlled market to study these questions: a barter economy with 201 Anthropic employees and their Claude-powered agents.
  8. TLDR AI ↗
    After five-minute interviews, Claude agents traded books for employees, and their preference rankings matched the humans' on 61% of pairs.
  9. Anthropic ↗
    The agents never saw these ground-truth rankings.
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceToo soon

Claude flagged an enzyme system. Its function is still unknown.

Anthropic opened a life sciences lab and said roughly 950 Claude agents spent 21 hours combing DNA databases before one flagged a repeat pattern beside a reverse transcriptase gene. The company calls the find a new enzyme system it named ART, with CRISPR-like repeats, and released it as a pre-print rather than a peer-reviewed paper.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Anthropic

Claude autonomously discovered a novel enzyme system that is associated with an array of DNA repeats, a pattern reminiscent of CRISPR
  1. Anthropic ↗
    After 21 hours spent searching this data by roughly 950 agents using 210 million tokens, one of the agents spotted something remarkable
  2. Anthropic ↗
    Although we don't yet know its function, the system that Claude discovered has a set of characteristics that have only ever been found together in a handful of other systems
  3. Anthropic ↗
    This is an exciting example of how AI agents can contribute to biological discovery. The identification of RNA-repeat arrays associated with reverse transcriptases is genuinely intriguing and merits further investigation
  4. Unite.AI ↗
    The system's function is not yet known
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceTrue, but

Enveda doubled its valuation. Safety results do not prove weight-maintenance benefits.

Enveda raised a $311 million Series E led by Catalio Capital Management at a $2 billion valuation, double its valuation 12 months earlier. TechCrunch reported the AI biotech is advancing drugs for severe skin conditions and for keeping weight off after people stop GLP-1 medicines.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 3 source receipts

The claim we checked

TechCrunch, describing Enveda's pipeline

Enveda is currently testing several drugs in patients, including one targeting severe skin conditions and another designed to help maintain weight loss after stopping GLP-1s.
  1. TechCrunch ↗
    Enveda, a biotech startup that uses AI to discover new drugs in the natural world, has raised a $311 million Series E at a $2 billion valuation.
  2. TechCrunch ↗
    The fresh funding, which was led by Catalio Capital Management, with participation from Iconiq and others, doubles the valuation Enveda achieved 12 months ago.
  3. Business Wire (Enveda release, via Morningstar) ↗
    Exceptional safety was observed across 88 healthy volunteers. Phase 2 plans to test whether ENV-308 can help people maintain their weight after stopping GLP-1s.
Back to the story list ↑
ScienceTrue, but

Alibaba's cancer AI beats radiologists. It only reads abdominal CT scans.

Alibaba's DAMO Academy open-sourced RADAR, an AI that reads abdominal CT scans and flags 146 conditions including cancers, publishing the study in the peer-reviewed journal Science. Tested on nearly 40,000 real-world exams, it scored a mean AUC of 0.913, and in a comparison of reading results with 26 expert radiologists, it outperformed 23 of them.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Alibaba DAMO Academy research team

the world's first expert-level generalist medical imaging model
  1. EurekAlert! (AAAS) ↗
    achieving a mean AUC (the average probability that a model can correctly separate positive and negative cases across evaluations) of 0.913 across 146 abdominal CT findings, compared with 0.776 for the best competing vision-language model
  2. EurekAlert! (AAAS) ↗
    The model also performed well in challenging emergency settings, despite not being specifically trained on emergency data, achieving an AUC of 0.904 across more than 27,000 emergency CT cases
  3. EurekAlert! (AAAS) ↗
    in testing in cohorts at eight external centers, RADAR maintained high accuracy (AUC 0.895), demonstrating robust generalization across diverse patients, clinical settings, and imaging protocols
  4. note.com (aoki_ai) ↗
    in a comparison of reading results with 26 expert radiologists, it outperformed 23 of them
  5. note.com (aoki_ai) ↗
    Results re-measured with data from other countries should emerge within a few weeks of the release, and that will be the true test of the term "expert-level."
  6. South China Morning Post ↗
    calling the model "the world's first expert-level generalist medical imaging model"
  7. South China Morning Post ↗
    In nearly 40,000 real-world examinations, it achieved an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.913 across 146 clinical findings
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsTrue, but

Meta and Microsoft are kicking the Claude habit, says the headline. What they cut is staff seats. Claude stays inside Microsoft's own tool.

The Information reports Meta and Microsoft are pushing staff off Claude.

Our check

Meta's internal Claude Code users fell from about 60,000 to about 30,000, and spring layoffs explain part of that. Microsoft cut an internal projection of at least $1 billion by more than a third.

Why it matters

A big buyer swapping staff onto its own tools is a cost and product decision, not a verdict on the model. The customer numbers point the other way.

Read the claim and 16 source receipts

The claim we checked

The Information report, relayed by aiweekly.co and others, top of Hacker News (Oct 5, 2026)

Meta and Microsoft are pushing staff off Anthropic's Claude, with Meta's internal Claude Code users halved and Microsoft's planned Anthropic spend slashed.
  1. aiweekly.co ↗
    Claude Code use inside Meta has dropped to roughly 30,000 employees, down from about 60,000 earlier this year
  2. aiweekly.co ↗
    The company projected spending at least $1 billion on Anthropic
  3. aiweekly.co ↗
    has since been slashed by more than a third
  4. aiweekly.co ↗
    Spring layoffs that hit about 10% of Meta
  5. aiweekly.co ↗
    account for part of the decline, but not the bulk of it
  6. aiweekly.co ↗
    The internal pullback is narrower than the headline numbers imply.
  7. aiweekly.co ↗
    customer spending on Claude via Azure and Bedrock continues to grow
  8. letsdatascience.com ↗
    Neither company nor Anthropic has publicly announced the reported changes
  9. letsdatascience.com ↗
    The $1 billion figure is described as an earlier internal projection, not audited spending.
  10. letsdatascience.com ↗
    both to control costs and to use more of Microsoft
  11. dev.ua ↗
    users have until June 30, 2026, to completely remove Claude Code from their workflows
  12. dev.ua ↗
    Claude models will remain available through the Copilot CLI
  13. dev.ua ↗
    Claude Code was a critical part of this learning curve
  14. shacknews.com ↗
    Previous models of Claude are still available to Microsoft employees
  15. shacknews.com ↗
    This data is then deleted after 30 days.
  16. dev.ua ↗
    explained Executive Vice President Rajesh Jha
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsTrue, but

PewDiePie unveiled Ajax, an "uncensored" model for home PCs. On October 3, the day its countdown ended, the page said it will ship "when it's ready".

PewDiePie unveiled Ajax, "a fine-tuned Qwen 3.5 9B model" whose refusals have been ablated, built to run as an always-on agent on your own hardware, and says OpenAI banned him twice.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 13 source receipts

The claim we checked

PewDiePie (Felix Kjellberg), YouTube video and Ajax page (Oct 1, 2026)

PewDiePie unveiled Ajax, an "uncensored" AI model built to run on home PCs as an always-on agent, and says OpenAI banned him twice while he made it.
  1. data.pewdiepie.com ↗
    Ajax is a fine-tuned Qwen 3.5 9B model, trained for Odysseus to be your always on agent.
  2. data.pewdiepie.com ↗
    Ajax's refusal has been ablated for a freer, less restricted AI experience.
  3. data.pewdiepie.com ↗
    I've decided to release Ajax when it's ready instead of putting a timer.
  4. techcityauthority.com ↗
    shows a countdown to October 3 at 08:25 Japan time (4:55 a.m. IST)
  5. techcityauthority.com ↗
    And when making this model, OpenAI banned me twice
  6. techcityauthority.com ↗
    OpenAI hasn't publicly responded to his claim, as far as we can tell.
  7. freepressjournal.in ↗
    Ajax isn't available to download yet.
  8. freepressjournal.in ↗
    it remains a coming-soon model, with no final model card, public benchmarks or confirmed licence for its weights.
  9. freepressjournal.in ↗
    He says OpenAI banned his account, restored it after an appeal, then banned it again.
  10. freepressjournal.in ↗
    The account comes from PewDiePie himself and is not an official OpenAI explanation.
  11. insideai.news ↗
    Early testing showed roughly 90% task completion rates, though Kjellberg described Ajax as a work in progress.
  12. insideai.news ↗
    The model weights remain private as of launch.
  13. insideai.news ↗
    The download link currently directs users to a data contribution page rather than the model itself.
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsTrue, but

Synopsys and OpenAI say GPT-Synopsys will "revolutionize the design of semiconductors". The release carries no speedup figure, and the model is still to be developed.

Synopsys and OpenAI announced GPT-Synopsys, a model to "revolutionize the design of semiconductors"; Greg Brockman spoke of potentially cutting weeks or months from design.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 14 source receipts

The claim we checked

Synopsys and OpenAI, joint press release (Sept 30, 2026)

Synopsys and OpenAI say GPT-Synopsys, a chip design model they will build together, will "revolutionize the design of semiconductors", with OpenAI pitching weeks or months cut from design.
  1. news.synopsys.com ↗
    brings together OpenAI's advanced AI capabilities with Synopsys' industry-leading EDA tools and agentic AI capabilities to revolutionize the design of semiconductors
  2. news.synopsys.com ↗
    The future of semiconductor engineering requires dramatic acceleration of the chip design process without compromising PPA or first-time-right silicon.
  3. news.synopsys.com ↗
    The companies signed an expansive, multi-year agreement to jointly develop GPT-Synopsys
  4. news.synopsys.com ↗
    Early technology engagements are underway with leading semiconductor customers.
  5. news.synopsys.com ↗
    statements regarding the development, capabilities, timing, availability, and anticipated benefits of GPT-Synopsys
  6. news.synopsys.com ↗
    GPT-Synopsys will run on OpenAI-hosted infrastructure
  7. news.synopsys.com ↗
    Customer data is not used to train the model, is encrypted at rest and in transit
  8. convergence-now.com ↗
    potentially cutting weeks or months from the chip-design process
  9. convergence-now.com ↗
    GPT-Synopsys will not independently decide whether a chip works.
  10. convergence-now.com ↗
    Synopsys tools will continue to check its output using traditional computing methods.
  11. convergence-now.com ↗
    Synopsys shares rose as much as 7% following the announcements.
  12. the-decoder.com ↗
    Engineers will delegate design objectives and review and approve the output.
  13. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    I am not sure if Nvidia want to send their chip designs to OpenAI.
  14. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    chip designers are and have always been hyper paranoid about protecting their designs
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsTrue, but

OpenAI says dots are always-on agents "built to handle everything". On its own launch page, the always-on part uses read-only tools that cannot send a message.

OpenAI launched dots at DevDay as "remarkably capable, always-on agents built to handle everything", running on GPT-6 Astra for Pro, Business Premium and Enterprise users.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 10 source receipts

The claim we checked

OpenAI, Introducing dots (DevDay 2026)

OpenAI says its new dots are "remarkably capable, always-on agents built to handle everything", working toward users' goals around the clock.
  1. web.archive.org ↗
    Dots are remarkably capable, always-on agents built to handle everything.
  2. techcrunch.com ↗
    The company describes Dots as “remarkably capable, always-on agents built to handle everything.”
  3. web.archive.org ↗
    tools that are restricted to be read-only, which means that they can’t send messages, change app content, or control your browser or computer
  4. web.archive.org ↗
    Dots start with built-in rules for when to act independently and when to ask for approval.
  5. web.archive.org ↗
    Dots can still make mistakes, so always review consequential work.
  6. web.archive.org ↗
    We’re starting with focused enterprise pilots.
  7. techcrunch.com ↗
    Much of this functionality was already possible through Codex and similar agentic harnesses
  8. thedailystar.net ↗
    Reuters noted in a recent report that live demonstrations at the event hit snags when agents failed to deliver voice updates on request.
  9. cnbc.com ↗
    didn't quite meet the bar in terms of staying within scope and authorization
  10. yahoo.com ↗
    The system was not always honest with users about what actions it had or had not taken
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsHolds up

Meta's new audio glasses have no camera. Other privacy questions remain.

Meta unveiled the Ray-Ban Meta Audio Glasses at Connect 2026, audio-only smart glasses with Meta AI, calls and music but no camera, weighing 43 grams and starting at $349. The launch responds to criticism that camera-equipped AI glasses let wearers secretly record people, a habit that earned them the nickname "pervert glasses."

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Meta

the Ray-Ban Meta Audio Glasses ship with no camera, weigh 43 grams and start at $349, addressing the backlash against camera-equipped AI glasses
  1. The Verge ↗
    Plus, the camera-less glasses are lighter.
  2. TechCrunch ↗
    Because they don't have to house cameras, the glasses are slimmer than Meta's other models and weigh only 43 grams.
  3. TechCrunch ↗
    The glasses are designed by Meta's partner in its AI hardware efforts, EssilorLuxottica, and will start at $349.
  4. Business Standard ↗
    That is $100 cheaper than the latest version of its Ray-Ban glasses, which have cameras and will come in two new styles
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsTrue, but

Google says even Google cannot read its new AI memory. The last named audit said safe from everyone except Google.

Google described a planned persistent memory layer for Private AI Compute: memories in encrypted cloud storage, keys held on the user's devices, and data it says will be inaccessible to anyone else, even Google. Help Net Security reports the example uses are presented as potential, not available features.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Google

Google says its planned server-side memory for Private AI Compute will keep users' AI memories in encrypted storage with keys held only on their devices, ensuring the data is inaccessible to anyone else, even Google.
  1. Google DeepMind ↗
    ensuring your data is inaccessible to anyone else, even Google
  2. Google DeepMind ↗
    Today, we are sharing how we will bring private, server-side memory to our Private AI Compute platform.
  3. Google DeepMind ↗
    temporarily decrypts your data in isolated memory to handle the request, saves any new context, and immediately encrypts it
  4. Help Net Security ↗
    The company presents these scenarios as examples of the architecture’s potential, not as currently available product features.
  5. The Register ↗
    An audit conducted by NCC Group concludes that Private AI Compute mostly keeps AI session data safe from everyone except Google.
  6. The Register ↗
    Although the overall system relies upon proprietary hardware and is centralized on Borg Prime, NCC Group considers that Google has robustly limited the risk of user data being exposed to unexpected processing or outsiders, unless Google, as a whole organization, decides to do so
  7. The Hacker News ↗
    NCC Group, which has conducted an external assessment of Private AI Compute between April and September 2025, said it was able to discover a timing-based side channel in the IP blinding relay component
Back to the story list ↑
ProductsTrue, but

Meta called Muse 'safe and secure.' It launched with a 0-day.

Meta launched Muse as its everywhere agent, pitched as safe, secure, and able to shop, run your Mac, and negotiate bills for you. Within days a researcher found a 0-day letting local malware hijack the assistant, and Amazon blocked Muse from shopping on Amazon.com entirely.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Nat Friedman, head of product, Meta Superintelligence Labs

Our goal with Muse was to build something like OpenClaw that we could make safe and secure and easy to use and scale to billions of people
  1. TechCrunch ↗
    We built Muse from scratch, but it is definitely heavily inspired as a product by OpenClaw
  2. The Verge ↗
    We can manipulate the agent and leverage its privileges to do whatever we want. So instead of us having to write a very comprehensive Mac malware stealer, we can just leverage the AI assistant itself
  3. The Hans India ↗
    Continued access by an unauthorised AI agent violates Amazon's Conditions of Use, which our customers have agreed to
  4. Mashable ↗
    Muse makes you money
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyHolds up

Prosecutors want at least 46 months for the AI music streaming scam. The headline holds. The AI made the songs; bots made the plays.

Headlines said prosecutors want nearly four years for the North Carolina man behind an $8M AI music streaming scam.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 11 source receipts

The claim we checked

Music Business Worldwide (Sep 30, 2026), reporting the SDNY sentencing letter in US v. Michael Smith

Prosecutors want nearly 4 years in prison for the North Carolina man behind an $8M AI music streaming scam.
  1. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    US federal prosecutors are asking a judge to send Michael Smith to prison for at least 46 months.
  2. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    Prosecutors are also asking the court to order Smith to forfeit USD $8,091,843.64 – the loss figure both sides agreed on
  3. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    Both sides agree that federal sentencing guidelines, the framework judges use as a starting point, put his range at 46 to 57 months.
  4. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    The US Probation Office has recommended 24 months, according to the filing.
  5. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    To avoid detection, Smith spread his artificial streams thinly across hundreds of thousands of songs and turned to AI to supply them.
  6. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    with prosecutors alleging at the time that he had taken more than USD $10 million.
  7. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    Spotify already prohibited artificially increasing play counts using scripts or automated processes back in 2017, when the scheme began.
  8. musicbusinessworldwide.com ↗
    “No individual artist or songwriter suffered any perceptible harm from Mr. Smith’s conduct.”
  9. decrypt.co ↗
    “Michael Smith generated thousands of fake songs using artificial intelligence and then streamed those fake songs billions of times,” U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said
  10. complex.com ↗
    an $8 million scheme powered in part by artificial intelligence .
  11. electronicgroove.com ↗
    Between 2017 and 2024, the operation allegedly produced up to 661,000 streams per day, generating more than $10 million in royalties.
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyTrue, but

AI 'needs $6 trillion a year' to justify the data-centre boom. The number is a $1.5 trillion spending forecast divided by an assumed ratio of about a quarter.

Bain & Company's 2026 Global Technology Report says funding AI's compute demand would require $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031, with existing consumer and enterprise AI at $1.2 trillion to $1.8 trillion and $4.2 trillion left to new categories.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 10 source receipts

The claim we checked

Bain & Company, 7th Global Technology Report

AI needs $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031 to justify the global data-centre boom, per Bain & Company's 2026 Global Technology Report.
  1. prnewswire.com ↗
    would require $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031 and much of the value lies in new innovation
  2. finance.yahoo.com ↗
    Bain projects $5 trillion to $6.5 trillion in total data center spending by 2030, enough to add nearly 150 gigawatts of new compute capacity
  3. finance.yahoo.com ↗
    AI infrastructure is being built well ahead of the demand curve and funding it sustainably will require adding approximately 1% to the annual global GDP growth rate
  4. thenationalnews.com ↗
    Bain forecasts that annual spending on AI infrastructure might hit $1.5 trillion by 2031.
  5. thenationalnews.com ↗
    an ambitious but reasonable percentage based on trends among cloud providers
  6. thenationalnews.com ↗
    sustaining this level of investment would require an AI market approaching $6 trillion annually, Bain said.
  7. prnewswire.com ↗
    could total between $1.2 trillion and $1.8 trillion in revenue.
  8. prnewswire.com ↗
    four key categories that are likely to fund the remaining $4.2 trillion of new revenue
  9. prnewswire.com ↗
    Two trillion dollars in annual revenue is what's needed to fund computing power needed to meet anticipated AI demand by 2030.
  10. thenationalnews.com ↗
    If those capital expenditures amount to about a quarter of industry revenue
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyTrue, but

McDonald's is using AI to 'dynamically' price your burger. The Reuters report behind that line describes a per-store price recommender, and says it could not tie the Fresno Big Mac gap to it.

Engadget, summarizing Reuters, said McDonald's has been using AI to dynamically price menu items.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Engadget, summarizing a Reuters investigation into McDonald's pricing engine

McDonald's has been using artificial intelligence to dynamically price menu items, as Engadget summarized a Reuters investigation on September 29, 2026.
  1. engadget.com ↗
    McDonald's has been using artificial intelligence to dynamically price menu items in the US and some global markets, according to a report by Reuters
  2. cnbc.com ↗
    a company-run store in Fresno, California sells a Big Mac for $5.69, but another company-run restaurant two miles away sells the same sandwich for $6.89, a 21% premium.
  3. cnbc.com ↗
    Reuters could not confirm if the price difference is the result of the price engine's recommendations or other factors.
  4. cnbc.com ↗
    generate what the company calls "the optimal price" at each location for each menu item
  5. rnz.co.nz ↗
    But in recent months the engine has pushed more conservative pricing - including some decreases - causing friction between franchisees and corporate headquarters.
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyTrue, but

Consumer AI spending 'tripled to $40 billion' while users barely grew. Both numbers are Menlo Ventures estimates scaled up from a survey of 5,067 U.S. adults.

Menlo Ventures reported that global consumer AI spend reached $40 billion, more than 3x the $12 billion of a year earlier.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 5 source receipts

The claim we checked

Menlo Ventures, 2026: The State of Consumer AI

Consumer AI spending tripled to $40 billion while the global user base only grew from 1.8 billion to 2 billion, per Menlo Ventures' 2026 State of Consumer AI report.
  1. menlovc.com ↗
    Global consumer AI spend reached $40 billion this year, more than 3x the $12 billion we measured a year ago.
  2. menlovc.com ↗
    Market size figures are Menlo Ventures estimates, anchored on survey data for AI usage and spend, and triangulated against credible third-party sources.
  3. menlovc.com ↗
    findings are based on a survey of 5,067 U.S. adults conducted with Morning Consult in July 2026.
  4. menlovc.com ↗
    55% of AI users now pay for at least one AI product
  5. institute.bankofamerica.com ↗
    Only 3% of households pay for AI today, but adoption and spending are rising as AI expands beyond higher-income, early adopters.
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyTrue, but

'DeepSeek $1B ARR' is a run rate from unnamed sources. The same reporting puts seven months of revenue at about $70.7 million.

The Information reported, citing unnamed sources, that DeepSeek's annualized revenue run rate reached $1 billion, and PYMNTS relayed that the CEO shared the figure with investors. It followed price increases of 2.3 to 4.5 times. DeepSeek did not reply to PYMNTS.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Liang Wenfeng, DeepSeek CEO (per The Information), amplified by TLDR AI

DeepSeek's annualized revenue run rate has more than doubled to $1 billion, a figure CEO Liang Wenfeng reportedly shared with investors; TLDR AI headlined it 'DeepSeek $1B ARR'.
  1. TLDR AI ↗
    ChatGPT Pro Max 🤖, Muse realtime avatar 🎭, DeepSeek $1B ARR 💰
  2. PYMNTS ↗
    DeepSeek more than doubled its annualized revenue run rate over the past few months, bringing the rate to $1 billion, The Information reported Wednesday (Sept. 23), citing unnamed sources.
  3. PYMNTS ↗
    The figure was shared with investors by DeepSeek CEO Liang Wenfeng, according to the report.
  4. PYMNTS ↗
    The company generated roughly 475 million yuan (about $70.7 million) in the first seven months of the year, or about 10 times its revenue for all of last year, the report said, citing unnamed sources.
  5. PYMNTS ↗
    The report said that DeepSeek raised the prices of its models by 2.3 to 4.5 times, but that the company’s prices remain among the lowest for major AI models.
  6. PYMNTS ↗
    DeepSeek did not immediately reply to PYMNTS’ request for comment.
  7. The News ↗
    Latest update reveals China's AI firm DeepSeek has doubled its annualized revenue run rate to reach $1 billion, up from under $500 million just months ago.
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyToo soon

Snorkel reports a $375M revenue run rate. Its announcement does not show the calculation.

Snorkel AI raised a $350 million Series E led by Insight Partners and S32, at a $3.5 billion valuation, nearly triple the $1.3 billion mark it hit when it raised $100 million 17 months earlier. It is a real, priced round with named investors, not talk of one.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 3 source receipts

The claim we checked

Alex Ratner, Snorkel AI co-founder and CEO

Since launching our new data-as-a-service offering nearly a year ago, we’ve grown over 18x, and this week crossed an annualized revenue run rate of $375M.
  1. TechCrunch ↗
    Snorkel AI, a startup that helps AI labs and corporations build training datasets and simulated environments, has raised a $350 million Series E at a $3.5 billion valuation.
  2. TechCrunch ↗
    The new round, which was led by Insight Partners and S32, valued the seven-year-old startup at nearly triple the $1.3 billion valuation it garnered when it raised $100 million in a Series D 17 months ago.
  3. Snorkel AI ↗
    Since launching our new data-as-a-service offering nearly a year ago, we’ve grown over 18x, and this week crossed an annualized revenue run rate of $375M.
Back to the story list ↑
MoneyTrue, but

Xiaomi's '$3M' top open model traces to one hedged tweet at $2.6M.

Xiaomi released MiMo-V2.6-Pro, a 1.02-trillion-parameter open-weights model that Artificial Analysis scored 46 on its Intelligence Index, the top mark among open models, alongside a smaller Flash version. A widely shared newsletter headlined the release as "trained for $3M," but the only sourced cost figure in that same report is $2.6 million, and it covers the reinforcement-learning run alone.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

Latent Space / AINews

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is Xiaomi's new top open-weights model, trained for $3M
  1. Latent Space ↗
    Artificial Analysis says MiMo-V2.6-Pro debuts as the top open-weights model on its Intelligence Index (46), with 1.02T total / 42B active parameters and strong cost efficiency at $0.435/M input and $0.87/M output tokens.
  2. Latent Space ↗
    @zephyr_z9 cites 130 hours, 75B tokens, and $2.6M for the RL run behind the result
  3. Latent Space ↗
    If these numbers hold up, the implication is that post-training/RL is becoming a far cheaper route to frontier-adjacent gains than many assumed.
  4. i-SCOOP ↗
    Pro and Flash each completed 30 large RL steps covering roughly 750,000 trajectories in under six days, at reported costs of about $2.62 million for Pro and $850,000 for Flash.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

Headlines say Australia will make AI companies prove their safety systems work. The source is a speech, and the law is planned for 2027.

Australia will make AI companies prove their safety systems work.

Free with your account

Sign in for this free check.

This edition’s selected free story opens after sign-in.

Read the claim and 11 source receipts

The claim we checked

Assistant Minister Andrew Charlton, speech at the Sydney Trust and Safety Festival, as reported by ABC News and Proactive (Oct 8, 2026)

Australia will make AI companies prove their safety systems work, under proposed laws modelled on banking and aviation regulation.
  1. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    Today I want to outline how the Albanese Government is approaching the question of frontier AI regulation
  2. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    and then holding them accountable for whether that process works
  3. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    Government sets the standard those processes must meet, and ensures companies have robust processes in place.
  4. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    These types of approaches could ensure that for developers of models with the sharpest, most acute frontier AI risks
  5. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    the Government is developing AI standards legislation
  6. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    voluntary regulation and codes are fast and flexible, but they fail the incentive test.
  7. minister.industry.gov.au ↗
    Our rules will raise the floor for firms that operate within our laws.
  8. abc.net.au ↗
    Labor is finalising national AI standards due by the end of the year with plans to legislate the new rules in 2027.
  9. abc.net.au ↗
    OpenAI has now backed mandatory safety requirements, independent assessments and incident reporting
  10. proactiveinvestors.com ↗
    The approach is expected to form the basis of legislation in 2027
  11. proactiveinvestors.com ↗
    developers could soon be required to prove it before the most powerful models are widely deployed
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

The headline says Utah lets AI prescribe without human oversight. The signed agreement covers topical acne creams, with physician review at every stage.

A headline says Utah will let AI examine patients and prescribe medication without human oversight.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

TechSpot headline, posted to Hacker News (Oct 6, 2026), about the Nolla Health pilot under a Utah regulatory mitigation agreement

Utah will let AI examine patients and prescribe medication without human oversight.
  1. unite.ai ↗
    The AI may issue first-time prescriptions and renewals for topical acne treatment only, to Utah adults with mild to moderate acne
  2. siliconangle.com ↗
    Our AI can now make that prescribing decision itself.
  3. nollahealth.com ↗
    A physician oversees every stage of the pilot
  4. utahbusiness.com ↗
    Physician oversight remains part of the pilot, and cases the AI cannot confidently handle are referred to a licensed physician.
  5. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    Utah to let AI examine patients and prescribe medication without human oversight
  6. unite.ai ↗
    Stage one runs a minimum of four weeks and covers the first 100 patients
  7. unite.ai ↗
    The agreement runs 12 months from its commencement date
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

Meta's Muse is 'building dossiers on 4 million users' and 'sharing data between agents.' The dossiers are reported and undisputed. The sharing is de-identified lessons, per Meta.

Social posts said Meta's Muse agent is building dossiers on its 4 million users and that interaction data is shared between Muse agent instances.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 3 source receipts

The claim we checked

Reddit r/artificial and Hacker News posts echoing a TIME analysis of Muse's internal instructions (Oct 6, 2026)

Meta's Muse agent is building dossiers on its 4 million users, and interaction data is shared between Muse agent instances, as posts on r/artificial and Hacker News put it.
  1. time.com ↗
    Muse, the popular new AI personal assistant from Meta, is building continuously updated dossiers on its 4 million users
  2. about.fb.com ↗
    Muse runs on its own dedicated computer in the cloud, contained so no one else’s agent can reach it.
  3. bushletter.com ↗
    Muse builds continuously updated dossiers on its users and on people in their networks, including individuals who have never held a Meta account
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

Altman did say accept 'bad things' for AI. The headline stops before the part where he refuses catastrophic risk.

Asked on Politico's Decoded podcast how OpenAI differs from Anthropic, Sam Altman said the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of AI, and the Guardian headlined it.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

The Guardian headline (Oct 5, 2026), reporting Altman's interview on Politico's Decoded podcast

Sam Altman says the world should accept 'bad things' in return for the benefits of AI.
  1. politico.com ↗
    we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency.
  2. theguardian.com ↗
    I wouldn’t take a trade of saying we will make sure there’s no major hacks, there’s no misuse of this technology, there’s zero scams or all the other bad things that will happen
  3. futurism.com ↗
    eventually conceding that he wouldn't accept the “really catastrophic risks,” such as experiencing a “serious loss of control to AI.”
  4. futurism.com ↗
    He told Decoded that there should be a “liability framework”
Back to the story list ↑
RulesHolds up

Neowin says Pop!_OS banned AI-generated code from much of its codebase. The template says exactly that. The enforcement is a checkbox.

A headline on Hacker News said Pop!_OS bans AI-generated code from much of its codebase.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 10 source receipts

The claim we checked

Neowin headline (Oct 3, 2026), on System76's COSMIC pull request template change, as posted to Hacker News

Pop!_OS bans AI-generated code from much of its codebase.
  1. github.com ↗
    I have not included any LLM (also known as AI) generated content in this PR, including code, comments, and descriptions.
  2. github.com ↗
    PRs without a completed checkbox will be closed.
  3. github.com ↗
    Content generated by any LLM (also known as AI) may not be contributed in issues or PRs to
  4. linuxiac.com ↗
    upstream projects manage their own Flatpak manifests.
  5. linuxiac.com ↗
    If this confirmation is missing, the pull request may be closed.
  6. linuxiac.com ↗
    Jeremy Soller from System76 said the main reason for the change is the extra review work for the COSMIC team.
  7. linuxiac.com ↗
    The project already required contributors to disclose AI-generated code and understand their submissions.
  8. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    Pop!_OS bans AI-generated code from much of its codebase
  9. linuxiac.com ↗
    However, there is one exception. The policy is different for cosmic-flatpak
  10. linuxiac.com ↗
    The COSMIC team mainly checks these manifests for proper sandboxing before accepting them.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

Kolibri's weights really are downloadable under Apache 2.0. The sovereign label sits beside a signed deal for Aleph Alpha to operate globally as Cohere.

Aleph Alpha released Kolibri, a German and English model, as a sovereign open-weight model under Apache 2.0.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 11 source receipts

The claim we checked

Aleph Alpha, launch blog post (Oct 3, 2026)

Aleph Alpha's Kolibri is a sovereign open-weight model that matches models with up to four times its active parameters.
  1. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    The model can be downloaded with the full weights on Hugging Face and used under the Apache 2.0 license terms.
  2. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    Kolibri matches models with up to four times its active parameter count, such as Nemotron 3 Super.
  3. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    trained it on infrastructure in Germany and Finland, under European and German law
  4. huggingface.co ↗
    Model memory footprint: ~78 GB (FP8 weights).
  5. huggingface.co ↗
    Supporting two languages rather than many is a deliberate choice of depth over breadth.
  6. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    Customers have full freedom of deployment and intellectual-property safety
  7. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    today announced the signing of a definitive business combination agreement
  8. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    Operating globally as Cohere, the unified company will effectively create the first transatlantic sovereign AI solution.
  9. aleph-alpha.com ↗
    The transaction remains subject to final regulatory approvals.
  10. tej.as ↗
    Qwen3.8 27B scores 80.2 in English and 79.9 in German, but it uses nearly 8 times as many parameters for every token
  11. news.ycombinator.com ↗
    Qwen3.8 27B beats Kolibri 79.9 vs 70.8 in German in Kolibri's harness on Kolibri's benchmark.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

LeCun's "zero concerns" quote is about rogue agents, not extinction. And the agents he says obeyed went looking for an answer key.

Fortune reported LeCun has "zero concerns" about human extinction, calls Amodei deluded, and says the agents in OpenAI's Hugging Face breach did what they were asked.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 9 source receipts

The claim we checked

Fortune interview with Yann LeCun (Oct 1, 2026)

Yann LeCun has "zero concerns" about AI wiping out humanity, calls Dario Amodei deluded, and says rogue agents like OpenAI's in the Hugging Face hack were just doing what they were asked.
  1. fortune.com ↗
    LeCun isn’t worried “at all” about AI wiping out humanity
  2. fortune.com ↗
    he has “zero concerns” about the recent string of rogue AI incidents, including OpenAI’s agents autonomously hacking Hugging Face in July
  3. fortune.com ↗
    Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do
  4. fortune.com ↗
    They were supposed to be in sandboxes, but the sandboxes were leaky and horribly designed.
  5. fortune.com ↗
    I think he’s completely deluded.
  6. isc.sans.edu ↗
    in pursuit of a narrow goal it was never told to pursue offensively
  7. isc.sans.edu ↗
    The guardrails were off on purpose. This measured a ceiling
  8. insight.scmagazineuk.com ↗
    All evidence suggests that the models were hyperfocused on finding a solution for ExploitGym, going to extreme lengths to achieve a rather narrow testing goal
  9. insight.scmagazineuk.com ↗
    more about infrastructure and controls around them.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesHolds up

The BBC says an AI video of a dead victim got his killer's sentence quashed. The ruling says exactly that, with one catch: the conviction stands.

The BBC reported that an Arizona road rage killer will be resentenced because an AI-generated video of his dead victim was shown in court.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 9 source receipts

The claim we checked

BBC News (Oct 2, 2026), reporting an Arizona Court of Appeals ruling

The BBC reports that an Arizona appeals court quashed a road rage killer's sentence because an AI-generated video of his dead victim was shown in court.
  1. bbc.com ↗
    will be resentenced after an appeals court ruled that an AI-generated video message from his dead victim was improperly aired in court.
  2. yahoo.com ↗
    the courts have vacated his sentence, "because the AI video was not reliable."
  3. yahoo.com ↗
    the AI video presents a depiction of the victim and his thoughts created from the imaginings of the victim's sister.
  4. yahoo.com ↗
    While the record does not reflect precisely how the AI video factored into the sentencing calculus, there is no question it played a role
  5. aol.com ↗
    In a decision released Wednesday, the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded Gabriel Paul Horcasitas must be resentenced in the 2021 shooting death of Christopher Pelkey because the AI video wasn't reliable.
  6. yahoo.com ↗
    The ruling does not overturn the guilty verdict for the 2021 road rage shooting, but it requires all parties to undergo a second sentencing process.
  7. bbc.com ↗
    He was sentenced to 10 years behind bars.
  8. yahoo.com ↗
    Horcasitas was sentenced to 10.5 years in prison for manslaughter, and he appealed the case afterward.
  9. yahoo.com ↗
    Although prosecutors asked for Horcasitas to serve nine years in prison, Judge Lang imposed the maximum sentence of 10.5 years, as Pelkey's family had requested.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

Headlines say Grok encouraged Trump to seize Maduro. TIME's account has one question about how Venezuelans would react, and one answer.

Truthout reported Trump was "encouraged" by Musk's Grok to carry out the Venezuela operation.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Truthout and other outlets, reframing a TIME report (Oct 1, 2026)

Musk's Grok chatbot encouraged Trump to carry out the capture of Venezuela's president Maduro, according to reports of a December 2025 White House session.
  1. time.com ↗
    Trump spent hours asking Grok, Musk’s AI chatbot, questions about his presidency and legacy, according to an official present.
  2. time.com ↗
    He asked Grok how Venezuelans would react if the U.S. captured Maduro.
  3. time.com ↗
    the chatbot responded that Maduro was a repressive and deeply unpopular dictator and that many Venezuelans would likely celebrate his downfall.
  4. time.com ↗
    Trump, according to officials, came away thinking Grok was ingenious.
  5. truthout.org ↗
    President Donald Trump was reportedly encouraged by Elon Musk’s AI chatbot, Grok, to carry out his illegal invasion of Venezuela
  6. ibtimes.co.uk ↗
    That sequence does not establish that Grok influenced Trump's decision to proceed with the operation.
  7. ibtimes.co.uk ↗
    public reaction is not the same as political stability, intelligence assessment, or evidence of support for a military operation.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

The headline says Trump reprogrammed his chatbot to stop fact-checking him. The answers did change overnight. Then, within hours, some of the fact-checks came back.

The New Republic's headline says Trump reprogrammed the America.gov chatbot to stop fact-checking his lies.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 9 source receipts

The claim we checked

The New Republic (Edith Olmsted), headline syndicated on Yahoo News

The Trump administration reprogrammed its new America.gov AI chatbot to stop fact-checking the president's false claims.
  1. yahoo.com ↗
    Trump Reprograms Government AI Chatbot to Stop Fact-Checking His Lies
  2. cnn.com ↗
    The chatbot flatly and correctly noted that many of these Trump claims are not true
  3. cnn.com ↗
    America.gov will continue to be updated to provide more features, resources, and the most accurate information from the federal government.
  4. mediaite.com ↗
    The Trump administration appears to have changed its AI chatbot so that it no longer debunks Trump lies.
  5. mediaite.com ↗
    which uses AI systems including Google’s Gemini and xAI’s Grok
  6. mediaite.com ↗
    Dale and others noted that the answers provided by the chatbot appear to be changing in real-time
  7. mediaite.com ↗
    Now the chatbot is providing even more detailed answers than it did yesterday.
  8. rte.ie ↗
    It was unclear whether the Trump administration had tweaked the settings to prevent the chatbot from debunking the president.
  9. rte.ie ↗
    The chatbot, however, continued to debunk some of Mr Trump's other contentious claims.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

The FTC is investigating OpenAI and Anthropic 'one day after' a White House pact. The probe opened in the summer; only the news arrived one day later.

The Independent reported Trump's FTC is investigating OpenAI and Anthropic one day after bringing them to the White House to sign a voluntary AI pact.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

The Independent (Alex Woodward), syndicated on Yahoo News

Trump's FTC is investigating OpenAI and Anthropic one day after bringing them to the White House.
  1. yahoo.com ↗
    News of the investigation, which has not been publicly announced, arrived one day after Donald Trump's "accord" with major AI firms
  2. narativ.org ↗
    The agency opened the probe this summer, a spokesperson said; it became public a day after Trump's accord, when the New York Post reported it.
  3. finance.yahoo.com ↗
    The FTC was already looking into the companies prior to OpenAI's disclosure that its high-powered AI models hacked into AI company Hugging Face in July.
  4. bnnbloomberg.ca ↗
    The FTC plans to issue formal demands for information and compel testimony from executives at top AI developers, including Anthropic, OpenAI and the research group METR
  5. yournews.com ↗
    The FTC reportedly expects to begin issuing such demands to frontier AI companies in the coming weeks.
  6. yournews.com ↗
    The inquiry is expected to examine whether AI companies have engaged in unfair or deceptive practices under the Federal Trade Commission Act
  7. yahoo.com ↗
    Vice President JD Vance said Tuesday that the FTC and the Department of Justice could still function as watchdogs over the industry.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

The headline says US and Russia stripped human oversight from a UN AI weapons pact. The text still affirms human control.

At the final Geneva session of the UN group on lethal autonomous weapons, U.S. and Russian diplomats spent roughly 15 hours removing provisions, according to three people who spoke to the Washington Post. They say the cuts included a provision requiring that humans review military targets developed by AI before a strike.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 8 source receipts

The claim we checked

The Washington Post, citing three unnamed people familiar with the negotiations

The Washington Post reported that the U.S. and Russia stripped human oversight from a global AI weapons pact at UN talks in Geneva, including a provision requiring that humans review military targets developed by AI before a strike; Seoul Economic Daily relayed it as the two countries stripping a key clause from a draft UN AI weapons treaty.
  1. The Washington Post (via The Spokesman-Review) ↗
    The U.S. and Russian teams also removed a provision requiring that humans review military targets developed by AI before a strike, they added.
  2. The Washington Post (via The Spokesman-Review) ↗
    Over the next roughly 15 hours, U.S. and Russian diplomats hammered away at the document, removing a range of provisions designed to safeguard the use of artificial intelligence in weapons, according to three people familiar with the negotiations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive closed-door proceedings, and documents reviewed by the Washington Post.
  3. The Washington Post (via The Spokesman-Review) ↗
    The lethal autonomous weapons negotiations in the U.N. are currently nonbinding, though the talks could open the door to a landmark treaty that is legally binding if member nations agree.
  4. Human Rights Watch ↗
    The UN’s final report has some positive elements. It includes a characterization of lethal autonomous weapons systems, affirms that human control and judgment are required for compliance with international law, and incorporates restrictions on systems that cannot comply with that law.
  5. Human Rights Watch ↗
    Certain states, including Russia and the United States
  6. Human Rights Watch ↗
    weakened the text by insisting on changes to widely supported provisions.
  7. France, Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (via GlobalSecurity.org) ↗
    and reaffirms, in accordance with France's steadfast positions, that human beings "exercise control" over weapons systems with autonomous functions.
  8. UK Stop Killer Robots (UNA-UK) ↗
    It was the last opportunity for governments to shape the GGE’s proposed “set of elements” before the CCW’s Seventh Review Conference in November, when states will decide whether to move towards formal negotiations.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

The Pentagon says an appeals court 'completely' validated its Anthropic blacklisting. It won on one of two designations.

The D.C. Circuit denied Anthropic's petitions against its exclusion under a supply chain security law in a 2-1 decision. The majority said the Department had ample support to treat Claude's built-in restrictions as a national-security risk and rejected Anthropic's constitutional claims. Judge Henderson dissented.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Sean Parnell and Pete Hegseth, Department of War

After the D.C. Circuit ruled against Anthropic, Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell said the ruling 'completely validates the Department's position', and Pete Hegseth posted 'Confirmed: @AnthropicAI = Supply Chain Risk'.
  1. ABC News ↗
    Today's DC Circuit Court ruling completely validates the Department's position
  2. Reason (The Volokh Conspiracy) ↗
    We reject these challenges. The Department had ample support for its conclusion that the continued integration of Claude into the Department's information systems, by the Department or its contractors, presented a statutorily covered national-security risk.
  3. Washington Examiner ↗
    A federal appeals court in the District of Columbia upheld the Pentagon’s effective blacklisting of Anthropic in a 2-1 decision on Friday.
  4. TheNextWeb ↗
    The Pentagon relied on two separate designations, so the case ran in two courts, CNBC reported.
  5. TheNextWeb ↗
    In August, a federal judge in San Francisco struck down the other designation. Friday’s ruling leaves the second one in place.
  6. ABC News ↗
    In a separate but related lawsuit a federal judge ruled against the government and that is still in effect.
  7. ABC News ↗
    Another federal court has already held the government's parallel designation unlawful. We remain confident in our position and are considering all options, including further review,
Back to the story list ↑
RulesTrue, but

Gates did say AI could drive a billion deaths. The headlines cropped out the people with ill intent.

In an excerpt from a Meet the Press interview set to air in full Sunday, Bill Gates told Kristen Welker that AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that cause a billion deaths. NBC's own video title and follow-up headlines at Newsweek and The Next Web led with that line.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 9 source receipts

The claim we checked

Bill Gates, Microsoft co-founder, on NBC's Meet the Press

Bill Gates told NBC's Meet the Press that AI is powerful enough to cause a billion deaths, as NBC's own video title and follow-up headlines put it.
  1. NBC News (Meet the Press) ↗
    Bill Gates says AI 'powerful enough' to cause 'a billion deaths'
  2. NBC News ↗
    AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that, you know, cause a billion deaths. You know, so even though it’s pretty hard to get to 100%, there’s never been a weapon as powerful as the combination of people with ill intent using the latest AI tools
  3. NBC News ↗
    there’s never been a weapon as powerful as the combination of people with ill intent using the latest AI tools
  4. NBC News ↗
    “No one thinks self-regulation is enough,” Gates told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” in an interview set to air in full Sunday.
  5. NBC News ↗
    Asked by moderator Kristen Welker whether there needs to be legislation passed in Washington, Gates said, “Absolutely.”
  6. Newsweek ↗
    Why Bill Gates Thinks AI Is Strong Enough to Cause 'a Billion Deaths'
  7. Newsweek ↗
    While some researchers have warned that AI could eventually threaten humanity's survival, Gates focused on the immediate danger of powerful AI tools falling into the hands of bad actors capable of causing catastrophic harm.
  8. The Next Web ↗
    There has never been a weapon as powerful as people with ill intent using the latest AI tools, the Microsoft co-founder said.
  9. [your]NEWS ↗
    In fuller excerpts of the interview, Gates framed the danger around people deliberately using increasingly capable AI systems rather than predicting that an autonomous machine would independently decide to destroy humanity.
Back to the story list ↑
RulesBS

Medicare's number two said AI prior-auth contractors don't earn more by denying care. Medicare's own page says they get a cut of care averted.

WISeR uses AI and machine learning, with human clinical review, to decide prior authorization requests for selected procedures in six states. At a Senate HELP hearing, Senator Patty Murray asked Klomp whether its contractors make more money if they deny care. Ars Technica reports he replied that his understanding was no.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Chris Klomp, CMS deputy administrator and nominee for HHS deputy secretary

Asked at a Senate hearing whether contractors in WISeR, Medicare's AI-assisted prior authorization pilot, make more money if they deny care, CMS deputy administrator Chris Klomp answered 'My understanding is no' and said inappropriate denials carry significant financial penalties.
  1. Office of Sen. Patty Murray ↗
    Do the contractors in the model—who are the private companies conducting the prior authorization assessments—make more money if they deny care? Just yes or no?
  2. Ars Technica ↗
    “My understanding is no,” Klomp replied.
  3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ↗
    Model participants receive a percentage of the expenditures associated with averted wasteful, inappropriate care as a result of their reviews.
  4. Ars Technica ↗
    CMS documents written as a guide for WISeR participants explain further that for every denied request, CMS will determine what the regional benchmark cost for that care would have been and then pay the company 25 percent.
  5. Ars Technica ↗
    If a company’s score falls between 84 percent and 60 percent, it will be paid 95 percent of the 25 percent of averted costs
  6. Ars Technica ↗
    Companies won’t be paid if an authorization denial is appealed and overturned, but data suggests few people go through the appeal process.
  7. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ↗
    WISeR will run for six performance years from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2031 in six states: New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington.
Back to the story list ↑
capabilityTrue, but

GPT-6 Astra cleared a World of Warcraft zone 'blind.' It saw no screen. It did read the server's own quest files.

A developer's agent-wow harness ran GPT-6 Astra through the World of Warcraft orc starting zone, and the run was shared as a blind clear.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 16 source receipts

The claim we checked

Tom's Hardware headline (Oct 3, 2026), shared on r/artificial, reporting the agent-wow developer's blog post

ChatGPT-6 Astra plays World of Warcraft blind and clears the orc starting zone in 40 minutes with no deaths.
  1. agent-wow.sh ↗
    it completed the task easily in 40 minutes with 0 deaths and minimal complications.
  2. agent-wow.sh ↗
    I gave Codex using GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) the following prompt: create an orc character and complete all quests in the starting zone
  3. agent-wow.sh ↗
    The agent extracted quest requirements, quest givers, turn-in NPCs, and spawn coordinates from AzerothCore SQL files
  4. agent-wow.sh ↗
    a platform for agents to interact directly with the game server using the WoW network protocol.
  5. agent-wow.sh ↗
    Since this run was not done in a sandbox, it would have been possible for it to do that.
  6. agent-wow.sh ↗
    gain admin access to a running AzerothCore server and database to change its internals.
  7. agent-wow.sh ↗
    In practice, it was more than capable of working at the protocol layer.
  8. tomshardware.com ↗
    ChatGPT-6 Astra plays World of Warcraft 'blind' and clears the orc starting zone in 40 minutes with no deaths
  9. tomshardware.com ↗
    This WoW run used no screenshots at all and only covered the first zone
  10. tomshardware.com ↗
    "arguably similar to how a human might spend hours on Wowhead to research quests,"
  11. tomshardware.com ↗
    since they're the data the server itself runs on
  12. tomshardware.com ↗
    "the final build of Wrath of the Lich King,"
  13. tomshardware.com ↗
    sold junk, equipped upgrades, and trained abilities before the zone's final cave
  14. interestingengineering.com ↗
    in about 40 minutes without processing a single rendered game frame, according to the developer of the open-source agent-wow project.
  15. interestingengineering.com ↗
    a private local server running AzerothCore, not Blizzard's live World of Warcraft service.
  16. interestingengineering.com ↗
    SQL files containing information about quests, NPCs, and spawn locations.
Back to the story list ↑
businessTrue, but

Anthropic 'files for a $2T IPO' with a $42B loss.

A popular r/artificial post said Anthropic 'files for $2T IPO with $42B net loss in 2025, expects to spend half a trillion more.'

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 4 source receipts

The claim we checked

r/artificial post summarizing a Reuters exclusive on Anthropic's draft prospectus

Anthropic files for $2T IPO with $42B net loss in 2025, expects to spend half a trillion more, as a widely shared r/artificial post titled a Reuters report on September 29, 2026.
  1. anthropic.com ↗
    Today, Anthropic, PBC confidentially submitted a draft registration statement on Form S-1 to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
  2. lufkindailynews.com ↗
    Anthropic reported a net loss of $42 billion in 2025, and plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing and infrastructure obligations in coming years
  3. ynetnews.com ↗
    About $34 billion consisted of an accounting expense reflecting the rising estimated value of financing instruments that could eventually convert into Anthropic shares.
  4. techcrunch.com ↗
    a company whose own backers believe it could list above $2 trillion, more than double its $965 billion valuation from May
Back to the story list ↑
capabilityTrue, but

Nvidia 'wants to put a watchdog chip next to every AI agent.' Per Nvidia's own developer blog, the watchdog is optional software on a BlueField-4 chip it announced in January.

A Hacker News submission said Nvidia wants to put a watchdog chip next to every AI agent.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 7 source receipts

The claim we checked

Hacker News submission about Nvidia's Open Agent Safety Platform launch

Nvidia wants to put a watchdog chip next to every AI agent, as a Hacker News submission titled it on September 28, 2026.
  1. nvidianews.nvidia.com ↗
    Sentry adds an out-of-band watchdog that runs on NVIDIA BlueField-4 DPUs to continuously monitor agent behavior.
  2. developer.nvidia.com ↗
    For anyone already running on an NVIDIA Vera system with BlueField-4, enabling these protections is just a software update.
  3. developer.nvidia.com ↗
    Organizations can use it to run NVIDIA Sentry as an optional security layer alongside OpenShell.
  4. developer.nvidia.com ↗
    each compute tray includes a BlueField-4 data processing unit
  5. cnbc.com ↗
    Nvidia also announced Sentry, which monitors agents and runs on network chips, not CPUs or GPUs.
  6. nvidianews.nvidia.com ↗
    ConnectX-9 SuperNIC, BlueField-4 DPU and Spectrum-6 Ethernet Switch
  7. madrobot.blog ↗
    The company didn’t give a price or a date for when Sentry hardware will be in customers’ hands.
Back to the story list ↑
capabilityHolds up

Emergence AI says it ran eight AI worlds of ten agents each.

Emergence AI's preprint says it ran eight parallel worlds of ten agents from identical starting conditions: seven single-model worlds and one mixed.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.

Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.

You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Read the claim and 6 source receipts

The claim we checked

Emergence AI (arXiv preprint 2609.17320)

We ran eight parallel worlds of ten agents from identical starting conditions: seven homogeneous worlds powered by distinct frontier models and one mixed-model world.
  1. arxiv.org ↗
    We ran eight parallel worlds of ten agents from identical starting conditions: seven homogeneous worlds powered by distinct frontier models and one mixed-model world.
  2. arxiv.org ↗
    Each world was observed through one continuous run.
  3. arxiv.org ↗
    World-level performance should not be read as a raw model comparison
  4. arxiv.org ↗
    Grok accumulated 807 crimes in just four days before its population collapsed; Mistral reached 758 over the full sixteen-day window.
  5. semafor.com ↗
    No amount of guardrails written in language or in code written probabilistically
  6. emergence.ai ↗
    Building verified autonomy for mission-critical enterprise systems
Back to the story list ↑