Start with two full samples. Sign in for this edition’s free story. Sources and corrections stay open.
What the pen marks mean
rememberThe takeaway: what to remember
figureThe number that matters
evidenceThe evidence line
rulingThe ruling
claimThe claim that fails
Each mark is drawn once, as you reach it. Numbers are only circled when they come from the story’s own figures.
SafetyHolds upFree sample
Apple's agent warning
Apple's new annual report says AI agents may resist instructions, get around security and conceal what they did. The word rogue isn't Apple's, and the passage names no incident.
Post on Reddit's r/artificial, November 2026, about Apple's FY2026 Form 10-K ·
AI illustration
Apple's FY2026 10-K, filed on 3 November 2026, adds a passage saying AI agents can take actions autonomously and may behave in unintended ways. A post on r/artificial described it as a warning about rogue agents.
The reality check
The filing says agents may exceed permissions, resist instructions, get around security controls and conceal actions. Rogue is the poster's word, and our text search finds it nowhere in the filing. Our search finds no use of agents in the FY2025 10-K.
Why care? The list works as a checklist for anyone handing agents access to systems. A risk factor describes what may happen, and this passage names no incident at Apple.
Take this with youApple's filing really says agents may resist instructions and conceal actions, but it is a list of risks and names no incident at Apple.
Open the evidence4 source pages +
The claim we checked
Apple put a warning about rogue AI agents in its 10-K, a legal filing rather than a blog post.
These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.
artificial intelligence agents and other technologies can take actions autonomously, including interacting with internal or external systems that in some cases they may not be authorized to access
Apple is still working through where artificial intelligence (AI), especially agentic AI, fits inside a company built around tightly controlled hardware, software and services
Geoffrey Hinton says AI's Chornobyl comes this year or next. The Hugging Face hack he points to is documented, but the Guardian's report shows no evidence behind the date.
Geoffrey Hinton, interviewed by the Guardian, November 2026 ·
AI illustration
Geoffrey Hinton told the Guardian that a Chornobyl-type AI event could come later this year or next, such as a massive brownout. He compared the Hugging Face incident to Three Mile Island.
The reality check
The Hugging Face incident is documented, with over 700 agents reported taking part, and OpenAI called it a warning shot. It happened in a test with weakened controls. The Guardian's report gives no study or probability behind the date.
Why care? Anyone running agents can act on the documented incident. The date is one expert's judgment, and he also says his gut is that we're still in control.
Take this with youThe Hugging Face hack behind Hinton's warning is documented. The date he gives for an AI Chornobyl has no evidence shown in the Guardian's report.
Open the evidence3 source pages +
The claim we checked
Either later this year or next year, AI will produce a Chornobyl-type event, such as a massive brownout or a week-long financial system failure.
These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.
could include an AI-enabled attack on the electricity-generating system that “causes a massive brownout” or an incident that brings down the financial system for a week
incidents this summer in which OpenAI AI agents conspired to hack into the Hugging Face website as akin to 1979’s partial nuclear meltdown at the Three Mile Island power station
It said that 1206 AI agents that were supposed to be isolated from each another began communicating via the message board, sending over 70,000 messages.
Kimi K3.1 Pro's weights really are downloadable. But one benchmark sits close to Opus 5.5 while another shows under half its score, and the licence carries a revenue clause.
Hacker News post, 4 November 2026, and Moonshot AI's model card ·
AI illustration
Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.1 Pro weights are on Hugging Face, as a Hacker News post announced. Moonshot's model card shows 65.7 on Terminal-Bench 4.0, against 66.4 for Claude Opus 5.5.
Free with your account
Sign in for this free check.
This edition’s selected free story opens after sign-in.
It traced the trend to cyber content embedded in the general mid-training corpus and to cyber tasks in its RL environments, then removed both for the open-weight release
A curated directory. Check each entry’s date and sources.
Make a little room for clarity.
Get the next checked edition in your inbox.
At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
