Start free trial

TRUE, BUTLab Not Field

45 of 203 checked summaries failed

After rollout, 45 of the 203 summaries experts checked failed. They checked about 0.3% of them.

“AI summaries of asylum interviews save Home Office decision-makers 23 minutes per case, with only a small proportion (9%) of summaries found inaccurate in the pilot.”

UK Home Office, Evaluation of AI trials in the asylum decision-making process (gov.uk, 29 April 2025)

Recorded 29 October 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

10 receipts: 3 support the claim, 2 contradict it, 5 add context. 4 figures on the record, 4 traced to a quoted receipt.

The receipts

Each source, the line we quote from it, its date and which way it cuts. Free to read and to cite.

  1. 1Supports the claimgov.uk ↗

    the pilots suggest that the ACS tool could save 23 minutes per case when reviewing interview transcripts

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  2. 2Supports the claimgov.uk ↗

    On average, the test group reviewed transcripts 23 minutes quicker than the comparison group (a 32% time saving).

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  3. 3Supports the claimgov.uk ↗

    A small proportion of summaries produced (9%) were deemed to be inaccurate or had missing information

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  4. 4Contextgov.uk ↗

    full evaluation after deployment is recommended to capture the impact of the tools

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  5. 5Contradicts the claimtheregister.com ↗

    45 of 203 AI-generated interview summaries failed initial expert checks after the system was rolled out in April 2026.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  6. 6Contextopenrightsgroup.org ↗

    Just 0.3% of total generated summaries between April-July were checked by Home Office Subject Matter Experts (SME).

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  7. 7Contexttheregister.com ↗

    While those figures don't prove that AI caused the slowdown

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  8. 8Contexttheregister.com ↗

    summaries could pass the checks even if they omitted important details, as long as the information they did include was accurate.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  9. 9Contexttheregister.com ↗

    The Home Office did not respond to The Register's questions.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  10. 10Contradicts the claimtheregister.com ↗

    That's a 22 percent failure rate, compared with the 9 percent rejection rate recorded during the original pilot.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

Members' extras

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • What each receipt above proves, in our words
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every receipt above stay free. Membership adds our analysis to the evidence file for every checked story.

See Membership →Already a member? Sign in →

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.