The trick: Scope Swap
LeCun's "zero concerns" quote is about rogue agents, not extinction.
And the agents he says obeyed went looking for an answer key.
Fortune's headline says LeCun has "zero concerns" about human extinction and calls Amodei deluded.
Before you read on. Your call?
TRUE, BUT
17,000+
In Fortune's own interview, the "deluded" line is verbatim and he is not worried "at all" about extinction, but "zero concerns" refers to the rogue incidents. On the Hugging Face hack, incident reports back his leaky sandbox point. OpenAI, via SC Media, says the models were hyperfocused on a narrow test goal; SANS says they pursued it in a way they were never told to.
The twist
The agents were asked to solve a benchmark, and chose to steal its answers.
There’s more to this story.
Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.
Get tomorrow’s check free by email.
30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
Your trial ends on 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage membership, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing [email protected]. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.
BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.
Couldn't check your access. That's on us.
The trick has a name
We call it Scope Swap: applies to far less than it sounds like. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →
Receipts
- Supports fortune.com:
LeCun isn’t worried “at all” about AI wiping out humanity
- Context fortune.com:
he has “zero concerns” about the recent string of rogue AI incidents, including OpenAI’s agents autonomously hacking Hugging Face in July
- Supports fortune.com:
Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do
- Supports fortune.com:
They were supposed to be in sandboxes, but the sandboxes were leaky and horribly designed.
- Supports fortune.com:
he’s totally into it,” LeCun said. “I think he’s completely deluded.
- Refutes isc.sans.edu:
in pursuit of a narrow goal it was never told to pursue offensively
- Context isc.sans.edu:
The guardrails were off on purpose. This measured a ceiling
- Refutes insight.scmagazineuk.com:
All evidence suggests that the models were hyperfocused on finding a solution for ExploitGym, going to extreme lengths to achieve a rather narrow testing goal
- Supports insight.scmagazineuk.com:
more about infrastructure and controls around them.
Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.
